Devon
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2008
- Messages
- 767
- Reaction score
- 0
Although the very high level of chloroform found certainly could be indicative of the substance having been purposely manufactured and used to subdue, render unconscious, or kill Caylee, I still think there may just have been a unique set of circumstances that caused this result.
The body was not only in an enclosed space, but was also further encased in plastic bags and subjected to the intensified heat within the trunk of a white car during a Florida summer. Chloroform apparently occurs very early in decomposition and is detected primarily in deprived oxygen conditions.
The comparison with 'typical' chloroform levels in adult decomp.studies does not indicate if the decomp.in those cases occurred under the same conditions or if the ADD periods were even the same, so IMO that comparison tells us nothing.
The other child's body used as a control was apparently wrapped only in a blanket, not encased in trash bags/a plastic lined laundry hamper, there is no mention of whether the trunk was opened/aired at any time or if the body was ever taken out/replaced during the 3 months before it was discovered. Is it possible that the levels of chloroform initially present in the trunk for the control body had dissipated/evaporated or otherwise altered in some other way during that 3 month period that affected the comparative test results?
There is also still the possibility that the high levels were caused by the action/reaction of products containing chloroform AND still the possibility that Caylee's body/clothes had contact with chlorinated water from a recently shocked (IIRC) pool before being wrapped and enclosed in the trunk.
The body was not only in an enclosed space, but was also further encased in plastic bags and subjected to the intensified heat within the trunk of a white car during a Florida summer. Chloroform apparently occurs very early in decomposition and is detected primarily in deprived oxygen conditions.
The comparison with 'typical' chloroform levels in adult decomp.studies does not indicate if the decomp.in those cases occurred under the same conditions or if the ADD periods were even the same, so IMO that comparison tells us nothing.
The other child's body used as a control was apparently wrapped only in a blanket, not encased in trash bags/a plastic lined laundry hamper, there is no mention of whether the trunk was opened/aired at any time or if the body was ever taken out/replaced during the 3 months before it was discovered. Is it possible that the levels of chloroform initially present in the trunk for the control body had dissipated/evaporated or otherwise altered in some other way during that 3 month period that affected the comparative test results?
There is also still the possibility that the high levels were caused by the action/reaction of products containing chloroform AND still the possibility that Caylee's body/clothes had contact with chlorinated water from a recently shocked (IIRC) pool before being wrapped and enclosed in the trunk.