southcitymom
Well-Known Member
Since I would bet my last nickel that the child didn't consider (or even know of) a possible financial gain through SS if he killed his father, I don't perceive benefits going to him as rewarding him for his behavior.
About Eryn - I have not read a lot about her. Am I correct that Eryn currently works outside of the home right now while the child's grandmother watches him?
Eryn remains something of a mystery to me. I do know she had just had visitation with her son prior to the murders and, IIRC, she did not high-tail it back to the child after the murders happened and the child was charged.
I have always wondered why the Father had primary physical custody and not her and have assumed, rightly or wrongly, that situations in her life at the time made her unable to fully care for him. Did she agree to the Father have custody of CR or did a Judge award custody to the Father against Eryn's wishes?
Linda, you opined that Eryn "never had a desire to support herself." What leads you to that conclusion?
About Eryn - I have not read a lot about her. Am I correct that Eryn currently works outside of the home right now while the child's grandmother watches him?
Eryn remains something of a mystery to me. I do know she had just had visitation with her son prior to the murders and, IIRC, she did not high-tail it back to the child after the murders happened and the child was charged.
I have always wondered why the Father had primary physical custody and not her and have assumed, rightly or wrongly, that situations in her life at the time made her unable to fully care for him. Did she agree to the Father have custody of CR or did a Judge award custody to the Father against Eryn's wishes?
Linda, you opined that Eryn "never had a desire to support herself." What leads you to that conclusion?