Lawyers are allowed make inferences and draw conclusions in closing arguments. Jury is instructed that closing arguments are not evidence.
Oh lord, he's already driving me crazy.
Looks like jury will have about an hour for deliberations. I would be shocked (and probably troubled) if they came back with a verdict before the day ends, no matter what it is.
So the ADA is now testifying that the "spoiled" data on BC laptop is due to a buggy version of Vista, WITHOUT actually putting a witness on the stand to prove that assertion????
You have got to be kidding me....
Boz just lied. The witness didn't say it would last 23 seconds. He said it would last 22 seconds.
Vista is very buggy and invalid timestamps do not prove tampering. There were invalid timestamps before Jul 11 and invalid timestamps after. They prove nothing and are diversions away from the smoking gun evidence that no one has ever shown to be fabricated, the google map search of Fielding Drive.
IF he is convicted, then i agree..............but he's not convicted yet
Vista is very buggy and invalid timestamps do not prove tampering. There were invalid timestamps before Jul 11 and invalid timestamps after. They prove nothing and are diversions away from the smoking gun evidence that no one has ever shown to be fabricated, the google map search of Fielding Drive.
I don't really feel good about this part...only 157 voip experts??
Cummings is a joke and COMPLETELY ineffective and irrelevant.