Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NG now discussing "New defense theory" that someone else dressed Caylee.
I assume that this is based on the DT pointing out the size 24 mo on the shorts and saying that someone that didn't know what size she was wearing would have mistakenly picked up an old pair of shorts that no longer fit.
I am sure that the parents on the jury understand that size is not consistent based on age...and that while kids outgrow some things...they can still wear things that are older.
Even CA said on the stand today that the photo showing Caylee in those shorts was in a "chubbier stage" when that photo was taken....telling me that Caylee getting taller and slimmer...she may still fit.
I have things that are 2 years old that my child can wear and others that they outgrew in 6 months.
Bill Shaeffer on NG tonight! YAY!
A woman lawyer would have never asked that question especially if she has children. Just sayin'
Nancy says Cindy is a "highly regarded nurse, and is probably smarter than all of us lawyers put together".... Huh?!
A woman lawyer would have never asked that question especially if she has children. Just sayin'
Jean Winetraub (sp) on JVM just said that she thinks the jurors asking for evidence shows that they were discussing the trial and it will send the case back on appeal... what do you guys think? Are juror questions recorded in some way?
If it was just one juror who asked about it then it doesn't mean anyone was talking about it..
WDYT???