Bit of a scathing article in the IndyStar critical of how BPD has handled the case.
USA Today just picked up the story from IndyStar and ran it under the title: Silence fuels speculation in case of missing student.
Bit of a scathing article in the IndyStar critical of how BPD has handled the case.
I'd never heard the name Lauren before this, now another college student named Lauren went missing last week.
In his comment to the press Reno certainly made it sound like CR was trespassing.P
Well I don't know about media outlets pressing the issue of the disturbing fact that Smallwood's behaviors and actions in LE attempting to see their video surveillance were very suspicious, and even disturbing and upsetting IMO.. Especially given the victim in the case is their very own tenant..
But I do know there are several of us hear who have on multiple occasions brought up how much we found it to be disturbing and suspicious as well as posted at great length and in-depth detail about those behaviors and actions of Smallwood leading up to BPD having to resort to using literal forced entry into the area where the surveillance was kept.. And with a court issued search warrant in hand, no less..
I'd never heard the name Lauren before this, now another college student named Lauren went missing last week.
Also see:
GA GA - Lauren Giddings, 27, Macon, 25 June 2011 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
I wondered if Smallwood brought up the list to point away from Lauren being the source of the altercation and thus, distancing themselves from Lauren...
I think that BPD knows way more about the story than they are letting us know. Why aren't they letting us know? Because they don't need to. If this was a random abduction, they would be giving the public way more information in order to find that person. But they know it's not a random abduction. ...
http://www.wthr.com/story/14886013/...erers-apartment-building?clienttype=printable
I'm reviewing what was said in the press. I hadn't really paid alot of attention to the details of the trespassing aspect since we know (well, I guess we think we know) he was there that night (at this point I sometimes wonder how much of anything we think we know is really accurate and actually confirmed by police. It's starting to blur together).
I'd heard there was a no trespass list that was rather lengthy and not that hard to get your name on. So, if it was just an informal list held by the apartment complex I'd wonder if CR even knew he was on it, and even if he was what power it would really have (or how it would be used) if an apartment dweller invited him in.
But in the article linked above it is referred to as a 'no trespass order'. That would imply to me that the proper legal steps were taken to make this official and he likely would've been informed of the order and even asked by LE to sign a paper acknowledging it.
But all that said, I don't see how it's a factor unless it ties into the confrontation inside Smallwood.
So it's probably more noise muddying the picture than anything.
Didn't LS's parents hire a PI? Or did I imagine that? If they did, do PI's share info with LE?
Any lawyer worth anything is not going to let their client be put on a witness stand and questioned under oath at length about a simple assault case when they are a POI in a missing person case.Just goes to show how full of it this lawyer is.If he did, I'm not aware of it. A few weeks ago, he made a statement to the press saying the person who hit his client should be prosected to the fullest extent of the law, or words to that effect. He didn't mention anyone by name, though.
Nobody was going to be "wrongly convicted" of anything if they didn't do anything wrong and just spoke honestly to LE, instead of issuing "statements" IMO. I do not believe wrongful convictions are rampant in this country, and these POI's have not even been named as suspects.
And now they have their lawyers, there is no reason they cannot make an appointment and make themselves fully available to answer questions. Better late than never, IMO.
As an lawyer who knows a lot about criminal law and procedure, I can assure you there are plenty of good reasons why someone would hire a lawyer regardless of their guilt. It is just a smart move and, believe me, there are MANY people who did nothing wrong and came forward to speak to the police and were rewarded by a lot of legal trouble. This is not a comment on anyone's guilt or innocence, just weighing in and saying they should not be judged because they hired lawyers.