It's ludicrous that the court thinks they can find someone innocent. Barring a rock solid alibi, of which there is none, there's no way they can claim that.
The verdict is also contradictory. On the one hand Knox is innocent of the murder, but on the other she's guilty of defaming Lumumba, also meaning there was no coercion in the interrogation. I'd like them to explain why she would defame Lumumba if she was innocent.
This is the crux of why I will find the motivations document very interesting. One part of Italian criminal law that is very different is that the judge is required, within 90 days, to write a document explaining the reasons for the conviction or acquital.
I find there to be a contraction here, and I suspect that Amanda may appeal this on conviction -- and might have a good chance at success.