gxm
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 3,392
- Reaction score
- 24
GZ was told by the police department spokeswoman at the NWP they were only to observe, not to follow and not to carry a gun. Everything except the gun is in that manual he received. I don't have a problem understanding what LE wanted GZ to do. GZ seems to be the one who wants to control the situation. Had the dispatcher known he had a gun he would have been ordered to wait for LE to arrive. That is not speculation this is LE's worst nightmare as is quite evident since GZ decided to take the matter into his own hands. jmo
Except he wasn't on NWP. He was going to the store. And he had a conceal permit. The problem with this case is there are no clear boundaries, legally no clear lines crossed. Everything that GZ did falls within the law. There are so many ifs, such as what if the dispatcher had ordered him to stay in his car. We can say he should have known better, or he should have done this, but in a court of law the defense will be able to read back the transcripts and there will be no order for GZ to stay in, or get back in, his car. GZ will be able to say he was trying to ascertain direction and where TM had fled to and there will not be any way to prove that he did not stop following TM (and was subsequently jumped as he headed back to his car). JMO, of course.