rosemadderlake
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
- Messages
- 3,395
- Reaction score
- 6,400
Bringing MMQC's post forward... Thread #1 post 728
"Not sure of age when she came to US. VI should help with that info.
PI hired? not sure of the time line but when I heard from SL's mother this happened and I was followed, you could have cooked an egg on my face then.[/I]"
(end quote)
bbm: MMQC - do you recall when EL told you that she had you followed? --Soon after SL's disappearance or years later?
IMO- I think the BF/F definitely told EL some version of the nature of the argument which could have been big, like a possible break up. MMQC had no idea what the argument was about, but EL did not know that, and she had both the BF/F & MMQC followed... Makes me think it must have been big. Was anyone from Wagner, pool party on the PI list or followed? -Or just MMQC & BF/F?
--Some other thoughts are-
I too wonder why MMQC (given the more fleshed out timeline) was never questioned by police in 1975? --But I think it is very possible her parents spoke with the ADA, and relayed their piece of the events of that night - because MMQC's father searched that night with her and LE knew the source.
I think with the prompting of the ADA, LE must have done some initial or further questioning and investigating. What did LE find out? -If the glasses were not returned to the family, then where is the information coming from that the glasses were "found broken in his car"? Who found the glasses broken in the BF/F's car? Why are they listed as "left in car" on the PR?
-I would think that "broken prescription glasses" would be the very piece that would prompt further investigation and even change the MP classification. --Perhaps even give the family legal recourse to light a fire under LE, initiate a search for her body, when their PI efforts did not return Sylvia...
But if the glasses are not broken and were handed over to LE by the BF/F, then there's not much evidence on the surface to investigate. So, how in the absence of evidence does one find out what really happened?
"Not sure of age when she came to US. VI should help with that info.
PI hired? not sure of the time line but when I heard from SL's mother this happened and I was followed, you could have cooked an egg on my face then.[/I]"
(end quote)
bbm: MMQC - do you recall when EL told you that she had you followed? --Soon after SL's disappearance or years later?
IMO- I think the BF/F definitely told EL some version of the nature of the argument which could have been big, like a possible break up. MMQC had no idea what the argument was about, but EL did not know that, and she had both the BF/F & MMQC followed... Makes me think it must have been big. Was anyone from Wagner, pool party on the PI list or followed? -Or just MMQC & BF/F?
--Some other thoughts are-
I too wonder why MMQC (given the more fleshed out timeline) was never questioned by police in 1975? --But I think it is very possible her parents spoke with the ADA, and relayed their piece of the events of that night - because MMQC's father searched that night with her and LE knew the source.
I think with the prompting of the ADA, LE must have done some initial or further questioning and investigating. What did LE find out? -If the glasses were not returned to the family, then where is the information coming from that the glasses were "found broken in his car"? Who found the glasses broken in the BF/F's car? Why are they listed as "left in car" on the PR?
-I would think that "broken prescription glasses" would be the very piece that would prompt further investigation and even change the MP classification. --Perhaps even give the family legal recourse to light a fire under LE, initiate a search for her body, when their PI efforts did not return Sylvia...
But if the glasses are not broken and were handed over to LE by the BF/F, then there's not much evidence on the surface to investigate. So, how in the absence of evidence does one find out what really happened?