No, my last sentence was in earnest:So, do I understand that there is some concern about the fact that, after Guede's trial, it was concluded that he did not act alone?
I suppose the evidence that was analyzed by the courts gave them no choice but to conclude that there was evidence of more than one culprit. That does present problems for Knox and Sollecito, but does that really mean that now the Supreme Court is also worthy of criticism? Is there any part of the Italian Judicial system that does not need to be criticized in order to paint Sollecito and Knox as victims?
I was not criticizing the Italian Supreme Court:
I was seriously and sincerely asking CH what, in his opinion, was the cause or motive of them to rule for several attackers if it is so clear that there was only one?