I have been following along since the beginning but not been posting at all. I have a few questions I wanted to ask, but since these things are never mentioned thought that they were not allowed.
. I'm curious about the death of an employee that DM was a witness to when younger, and also the...
This Jury has not heard the most incriminating evidence that was shared during the TB trial about DM's lifestyle. What he is doing today is showing that Text's against him were handpicked to prove the Crowns theory, however, he is trying to show that he is just a normal guy and MS was the true...
The MM stuff may be a precursor to argue that she did smuggle ammo from the US, and she did that for MS, either rather than or in addition to doing it for DM.
The date for MM returning to Canada with Millard was July 30th, much later then July 3rd.
I thought it meant that the person had a second vehicle that he used at times and if they knew what he drove they would know if he was home or away????
I posted earlier that I thought the gun evidence text messages between MWJ & Millard which were not shown to the jury showed Aiding & Abetting. He acknowledges selling the gun to DM who in turn showing intent and premeditation replies that the gun will be returned dirty. MWJ says no problem...
Mmmm, not sure, however I know his intent to move to Calgary to pursue a career selling drugs to clients with a lot of disposable income definitely wasn't.
I've been asking that myself. It would be interesting to see a little more then those few minutes when he asked for a lawyer. I believe the interrogation would have lasted quite some time and video evidence of MS suffering from Crack withdrawal would definitely prove NS's claim that MS was a...
Respectfully, NashBridges2, I would like to point out that I am one of the "people" having a difference of opinion. I have never, ever nor have seen the other two "people" state, assume or imply anything that you are suggesting. We simply reply to queries with our opinion and an explanation to...
And that is exactly why I believe there was too much evidence suppressed that should have been allowed in this case, however, if presented here would present legal arguments down the road regarding the integrity of evidence in future trials.
The text convo between Iisho & Millard clearly show...
There was no Warranty expiry date on that contract. It was a deal that was made that stated IMO that, if and when DM was done with that gun he could return and MWJ could change the print on it. It should have been allowed into evidence as it showed, regardless of the fact that we did not...
If their only intent was to murder they would have taken a person off the street (Laura). If their intent was to murder a person while stealing a truck they would have targeted and searched for a person with a more rural location such as TB. Was there any other searches on any of the computers...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.