Search results

  1. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #20

    This is partial truth, at best. Just google the phrase "suspect named" and you will find plenty of suspects who are indentified by LE. POI is also used when LE simply does not know who is involved, but has an idea of who they likely need to talk to. If you falsely imprison anyone these days...
  2. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #20

    In my opinion, being one of the last known people to see a missing person isnt a small thing. I put a lot more weight into the fact that someone was with a victim the night of their disappearance than a bunch of guess work that may or may not put someone at the scene. I understand IMO stands...
  3. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #20

    Are there any rumors that have circulated involving JW and use of hard drugs? Are there any reports of JW being friends with JR?
  4. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #20

    We also should not fear responding to someone else's opinion with our own, if we disagree. There is no real way to have a discussion unless we reference what one another says or thinks. There is no possible way that a sleeping alibi can be rock solid.
  5. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #20

    I implore you to find one single case, in the entire history of missing persons cases, where a significant other (without an iron clad alibi) is not suspected to some degree. This does not mean JW is innocent, but reading into him as a suspect and guessing why he is a possible suspect is...
  6. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #19

    Dogs noses do lie. Airports are emptied, occasionally, because a dog hits on something that isnt there. People's cars are searched because dogs hit on substances that arent there. Without any knowledge of Gale's entire search. Without any dates or evidence that the dogs didnt hit on anything...
  7. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #19

    I know that there have been cases where psychics have been involved, even at law enforcements request. My question to everyone is- is there one case where it is reported or someone other than the psychic has gone on record to applaud them for their help in a case? Maybe I am a cynic, but I see...
  8. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #19

    I saw this video, but I am always skeptical of things that come out after the fact. She could have 30 other tapes sitting in her closet, that hit on spots Caylee wasnt found at.
  9. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #19

    Is there any proof that help from a psychic actually amounts to anything? Not asking to be obnoxious, but is there any conclusive evidence that a psychic has helped to solve a case? Some vets on here might know the answer to this.
  10. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #19

    I agree. maybe insignificant is a better word. I feel like, at this point, the Speirer's have probably had their hopes lifted and dropped so many times that I may hesitate to share information unless I felt that it certainly moved the case forward. I am not LE; just trying to put myself in...
  11. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #19

    Why? A cadaver dog hitting on a scent is unimportant unless the follow-up translates to finding the victim or information about the victim. I dont know if LE feels the need to have Mr. and Mrs. Speirer ride the roller-coaster of emotions every time an incomplete piece of information comes up...
  12. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #19

    with it Im not sure if there is much of a BS meter to look at. It really comes down to whether you beleive that the person on the PT thread is indeed JW's roomate. Through his posts he seems consistent, but people have faked having their law degrees and have gotten away with it, in the past.
  13. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #19

    Tony-why not just share what you know<mod snip>? Were the shoes found somewhere other than the bar, as far as you know?
  14. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #19

    We dont really even know that CR/MB have really ever been on the hook, aside from being named POI's early on in the case. The only way either of them could really be considered suspects is in a scenario involving multiple people. It has been stated by LE that JR was the last known person to...
  15. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #19

    I dont think they were necessarily looking to ilicit any response. If they have identified one guy as the likely suspect, but they dont have enough evidence to make an arrest they may want to allow the suspect to relax. Sending dogs into the homes of two people who are on opposite ends of the...
  16. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #19

    I dont know that all guys text obsessively. We dont even know if the fight had anything to do with LS. We dont know if LS was lying to HT about her intentions that night because she didnt yet want JW to know she was interested in another guy. We dont know if LS left JR's room. We dont know...
  17. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #19

    It was probably a poor choice of words on my part. But, the point remains that they cant really have probable cause to search both apartments unless this case is something out of the movies and JR and JW co-conspired (that does not really seem like a likely scenario, though)
  18. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #19

    I will explain. If BPD clearly has identified one of the two (JW or JW) as a clear suspect, but do not have enough evidence to make an arrest, they may not want to alert him to the fact that they have sufficiently narrowed the search. I think one scenario most of us will agree probably didnt...
  19. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #19

    I wouldnt put to much weight into the dog search. They searched JR and JW's residence. Two people with totally opposite stories. The guilt of one proves the innocence of the other. I think BPD is either A) focused on one of them and searched the other house as a decoy or B) they are grasping...
  20. T

    IN - Lauren Spierer, 20, Bloomington, 03 June 2011 - #19

    Has nothing do do with wanting to keep someone smelling clean. It has everything to do with people having a completely different response to the facts in the case. This is a good thing. I am sure that during difficult cases members of LE may differ on their opinions of what happened. This...

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
141
Guests online
4,219
Total visitors
4,360

Forum statistics

Threads
593,675
Messages
17,990,679
Members
229,207
Latest member
M.Lee
Back
Top