Search results

I think this is just a case of a reporter trying to be sensational. He's also incorrectly quoted SM and Patterson in this article. As to the hacksaw, as I stated a few posts back and in other posts, whether or not this was planted intentionally IMO depends on just how much blood stain was...

Since much of what we discuss here revolves around "why SM would do something", I wanted to point out that SM himself gave us a very important clue. In one of his internet posts, he stated he took a Myers-Briggs questionnaire and was of the INTJ personality type. This also corresponds to...

I've made a few statements about the hacksaw, but I think this one covers my take on this. Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Found Deceased GA - Lauren Giddings, 27, Macon, 2011 June 27 - #10 What I mean is that the hacksaw packaging, master key and/or LG's key, etc...

Have I missed or forgotten something?

I'm still holding to my thoughts that SM had no backup plan to frame anyone should his 'missing person' plan fail. For one, to do so would be for him to admit that his 'missing person' plan could fail, and I think he was too arrogant to do this. Also, if this were the case, you would expect...

I got the impression that most of his things had already been moved and he probably only had a few boxes and misc items to pick up. I say this because BB stated he'd asked her to stay there with him while he collected the remainder of his things. I doubt BB would have hung around if he had...

I thought I'd point out that LG's mother made a post yesterday to her Facebook page, linking to the ‘A light from the shadows’ Telegraph article. Her post and the comments it's generated are quite touching. :heartbeat: :praying: :heartbeat:

Ok... now that is a really good point. The article states she said they were hers... but she's not "quoted" as stating this. hmm... must sleep on it :)

If not, did the PI think to ask her if she had noticed them? Since we was just recently working in that area. :waitasec: :hand: :offtobed:

It does seem to only be inferred, doesn't it... :slapfight: ETA: but then, that is the title of the article. Complex owner: Blue gloves belong to me :slap:

Well, except these were obviously not planted, nor hidden. So, these would not have even been there during any LE searches. Really makes you wonder why the heck Buford even brought this up? Could this PI really be this incompetent?

Complex owner: Blue gloves belong to me http://www.macon.com/2011/09/01/1685668/complex-owner-blue-gloves-belong.html

:cat: Yeah, but what's dawg spelled backwards? :poke:

As to the underlined... the fact that this was brought up and that SM had said this never concerned me. For one, we don't video of this, so we don't know just how much concern he showed - and even this would be a matter of interpretation. Second, I would probably have said something about it...

Just catching up here... but wanted to make a general observation. (MOO of course) I doubt seriously that the DA is going to present anything about what search dogs hit on as part of their evidence to convict SM. The dogs were a tool used to help LE determine where the crime scene may have been...

I would think that a jury's main concern would be knowing that the witness is credible and trustworthy. Being a financial adviser would certainly demand these qualities. Here are some financial industry links you may find useful: http://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment.shtml...

Given how strict the Air Force's requirements are for pilots, this could be something as simple as a medical disqualification. Eye exam, heart murmur, failing some G-force test, etc... :twocents:

Also, given SM's obvious affinity for writing, I would not be surprised if the computer forensics didn't also turn up a very detailed document outlining this "perfect murder". Even if it's in the form of a hypothetical story, it would just further corroborate TM's (and possibly others')...

How about something appropriate for SM?

Given this new information, I was a little concerned about Patterson's testimony as to when TM and SM were roommates. So I went back and watched this. It appears he covered himself :)