"No, not anymore. The Mormons killed my brother and my mom," Charlie said, according to the documents. "Yeah, its just me and my dad." and
I am going to come to your house at night and kill you!
BBM
Was jp trying to train Charlie that Braden would be killed ? by mormons? like his mom?
Hey, I am sorry but authorities knew this information and yet did NOTHING!!!!
Sorry but that is chilling! come to your house At NIGHT and KILL you?
Charlie was going to need allot of counseling being with this monster!
Here's what I'm seeing. The psychologist who evaluated the coward knew of ALL the bizarre statements from the kids and the coward's alienation of his kids from their dead mom and her parents. Despite this, he recommended on-going supervised visits AND eventual reunification. So, he was looking at returning custody of two little boys to the man who obviously murdered their mother. Obviously.
Then, he gets wind of 400 graphic images of child *advertiser censored*-type depictions. He realizes he may have been fooled about the coward's sexual proclivities. he then recommends a psycho-sexual eval and on-going supervised visits until that is completed.
http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2012/...urce=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter#storylink=cpy
Huge problems for me for several reasons. First, the obvious fact that the coward murdered his wife was ignored by the psychologist. He seemed to have even ignored the possibility that he murdered his wife. Someone who murders their spouse should NEVER have custody as spouse-murderers are just a hop skip and a jump away from killing their kids. LE knows this, policies in California Family law reflect that, why wouldn't a psychologist understand that?
Second, barring the psychologist's clear error in ignoring the possibility that the coward murdered his wife and is thus a danger to the kids, he was flat fooled by this charming murderer. "A good father." yeah, right.
Third, after the psych was forced to reevaluate his position upon reviewing the *advertiser censored*, he doesn't recommend halting supervised visits? Or making sure they are seriously restricted?
So many things went wrong in this case. So many things that shouldn't have. These are not clerical errors or harmless lapses in judgment. These are people's lives.