jodi arias TAKES THE STAND FOR 14TH DAY #68*may contain graphic and adult content*

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've been here for 5 years....I've learned when its wise to keep my mouth shut! LOL But thanks for the opportunity. Most often, I am in the majority but not today.

No one in my family could stand the site of Jodi Arias when the trial started.....and there are many aspects of both the accused and the victim which are disgusting. But none of us see this as being a clear-cut pre-meditated charge.

It seems everyone here views it as obvious and wastes no time slamming the defense and the accused, while praising the victim. I respect the victim, make no mistake on that...simply because he was murdered and it was horrible. I feel terribly for his family and loved ones. I feel terrible for the Arias family.

Remember that this jury (and I've been on a few) has no idea what is going on in the media circus out here. They are limited to what they see in court. It truly makes a huge difference. I am curious as to how they are perceiving this case.

I do not believe Arias will receive the death penalty...even if she deserves it. I don't know that the threshold of proof beyond a reasonable doubt has been reached in regard to pre-meditation.


First, you are quite incorrect in your characterization of everyone praising the victim.

Simply because most here are unwilling to be deceived by a torture-murderess doesn't make them worshipers of the deceased. Interesting that you chose to phrase it thus.

You say that he was "murdered" and that it was "horrible" -- your words. And then you go on to say that pre-meditation was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Please explain why you believe that Jodi Arias is a murderer, as you state, since you don't perceive that the case has been made by the prosecution.
 
She is not abused and never was. And sadly she only admits to lying about putting a stamp on an envelope and other things.

She continues to maintain one of the most heinous lies we have seen in a murder case. That a young man abused and beat her, was a pedophile, sinned against his church, and attacked her and tried to kill her on more than one occasion.

Now, if she wants to set the record straight about that last point, I'll be the first to back off.

What is the evidence you have seen that proves Arias was never abused? I have no idea if she was or wasn't....the evidence hasn't shown me much except that she lied when she got caught...and I see that every day. I work with married people..and unmarried people...who lie when they are caught in much less serious things than murder.

She and the victim both sinned against the church....so what? That is not a lie.

Arias has some deep-seated emotional and psychological problems. That, I agree with. Let's see what her expert witnesses have to say. I just need to see more. Personal opinion only...
 
So...people here are "terribly attacking" poor abused Jodi with words?

That has to be one of the more ridiculous things I have ever read on Websleuths in all the time I've been here.

I guess as long as she admits that she killed him, she is given a pass. BUT, she might have admitted she killed him, but has not admitted to slaughtering him like a wild animal. She will never admit to that. Why? Because she is a narcissistic sociopath and a murderous monster. SHE is the one who did this to Travis. I don't think that there is anything that she could be called that would even remotely describe what she should be called.
And very consistent with psychopathy she still continues to destroy her victim to this day. All her claims of his deviancy and her abuse were not mentioned to a soul until 2010.

I could buy abuse with no evidence for obvious reasons. I cannot reconcile the fact that in all the research I've done on Travis I could not uncover ONE common sign of an abusive personality. There is nothing to suggest a pattern of controlling behaviors on his part at all - there would be, there should be, if he were truly an abuser. Many of which are very apparent in Jodi's makeup, ironically enough.

Decades of research into pedophiliac preferences paints another pattern of behaviors. Yet according to Jodi, Travis defies many of those 'knowns' as well.

And because she didn't have proof to her lies she sought to engineer evidence to be consistent with her claims. Again very consistent with a disordered personality.

As such she is not entitled or deserving of a whit of my compassion.
 
I have been searching everywhere trying to find officer friedman's testimony on youtubem to see what he testified about regarding the burglary of Jodi's grandparent's house. I can't find it anywhere and finally decided to register on ws just so I could ask all of you. Can anyone direct me to a link?

Thanks!


Welcome Fred!!
 
I don't know if the new and revised, edited version of the tape would be considered new evidence (although they did enter it into evidence with it's own number and designation, so... need a lawyer to answer this one). My guess is it was presented as a new item of evidence. bidk.

I think because it has a NEW evidence number then Juan gets to recross her on it. JMO
 
OK, sorry....maybe that is so.

I have been used before so I can relate in part...and I hated myself for allowing it and for participating in it. For that, I have compassion.

People here are mercilessly cruel. To say, "Die *****!" is horrible for anyone to say to another human being...especially here at WebsleuthIms. It shouldn't be allowed and I'm horrified. That makes us, in some regard, as no better than those who do these heinous things we see here day in and day out.

I hurt for both families. Its terrible that Travis died as he did. No doubt he used Arias. She let it happen and didn't stop it. Did she kill him out of jealousy? Perhaps. It seems logical. But they had been broken up and she was moving away...so why would she be so jealous at this point? Its very sad all around.

No outcome will fix anything. Alexander cannot come back and Arias will pay with her life...whether alive or dead. I do not think Arias will receive the death penalty....but what do I know...
Its very discouraging to see humanity in this state. I'm more disappointed in the bashing I see here than anything else. After hundreds of posts and countless cases over several years, I have rarely seen such.

I'm going to jump in here because you're catching a lot of flack and I do agree with some of what you're saying.

I believe many who are so interested in this case are so outraged at the brutality of the crime and have such a passionate desire to see justice done, that it has become nearly impossible for them to see anything redeeming or sympathetic about Jodi. If she testifies about anything potentially negative about Travis, many assume she's lying. If she testifies about anything that humanizes her or benefits her case at all, there's an assumption she's lying. IMO this kind of mindset has been carried to the point of absurdity at times - to the point of hostility towards other posters who have a legitimately different point of view, and that IMO causes the discussion to be artificially limited at times.

I am firmly and absolutely convinced that Jodi committed this murder with premeditation. I can only guess at her motives, same as anyone. I think Jodi has lied to benefit herself, and I believe there's good reason to have suspicions about all of the negative things she has said about Travis -- she has shown that she will say whatever she thinks will help her at the moment.

However, I think it's also short sighted to believe that everything she says is a lie if it paints Travis in a poor light or paints her as sympathetic. Many here didn't believe Travis engaged in all these sexual activities with her -- but now we've heard him talking about the things he has done with Jodi and what appeared to be an ongoing sexual relationship with her at least until a couple weeks before she killed him. Those things did happen even though no one wanted to believe it of Travis.

I think it's wise to have suspicion about the things she says unless there's corroborating evidence, but until we've heard all the evidence there is - there's nothing wrong with keeping an open mind. Some things we have believed were lies from Jodi have turned out to be true. I think the journal entries today showed a side of Jodi that I never considered -- I think she tortured herself over Travis. She might have actually "felt" abused even if it was a totally distorted perception. But if Jodi has some amount of humanity to her, or if it's possible to see her as something other than an evil monster throughout every moment of her life, does it matter to the outcome of this case? I think not.

I like to think of it in terms of a worst case scenario rather than assuming she must be lying about the negative things she says about Travis. Of the things that have not been completely disproven from her testimony --what remains and would it even matter if all of those things are actually true? Right now, that's the worst case scenario.

From her testImony, here are the things that have not been conclusively disproven IMO:

Her testimony about Travis choking her on one occasion. I don't remember when this was supposed to be, but I don't recall any journal entries or other evidence directly refuting this episode. I believe the other alleged incidents of abuse have been disproven.

I think it's been established that Travis had a sexual fantasy involving tying her to a tree.

I think it has so far been established that Travis engaged in a push-pull dynamic with her. I would even concede that Jodi felt intense emotional turmoil over it. I do not believe it has been established that Travis' motive in the push-pul was anything malignant or cruel or anything other than his own ambivalence and fuzzy boundaries.

I do not think its been proven one way or the other whether or not Travis had sexual experience aside from Jodi.

It has not been established in my mind that Travis ever cheated on Jodi or that he cheated on Lisa.

It has been proven to my satisfaction that the pedophile incident never happened. To me this was proven through her absence of any mention of it, even in couched terms, in any of her 8,000 messages with Travis and in her journals. I suspect that Jodi distorted something and interpreted it to mean that Travis had some deviant sexual predilection -- but I do not think she really believed it, she just used it to hold over his head as a means of elevating herself and controlling him.

It has been established to my satisfaction that she stole the gun and took measures in advance to make it appear she was not in Mesa.

It has been established to my satisfaction that Jodi's finger injury happened on June 4, even if she cut her other finger on May 31.

That's about it, as far as I'm concerned.

So even if we assume the truth of the remaining incidents that have not been directly disproven - does this help her avoid conviction or the death penalty? Worst case scenario. IMO even if those things are true, it does not help her avoid conviction and does not help her avoid the death penalty. Heck, even if the pedophile incident were true it doesn't help her because premeditation has been proven, and none of her testimony established anything that would lead a reasonable person to fear for their life in the circumstances Jodi has described on June 4. The death penalty is appropriate because of the immense brutality of the crime, and nothing. negative about Travis is mitigation for Jodi.
 
Didn't one of Travis' friends say she likely learned the speaking and other "sell her story" skills from PPL training sessions? Thought I saw that on the Dateline special.

Yes, IIRC it was Abe Abdelhadi.
 
I am surprised that many of the women who have been hurt by men do not have more compassion for Arias. Not compassion for the murder but for more understanding about abuse and how it works.

I will step away now....carry on.

[EDITED BY RUK]

Hi Shefner,

No need to step away. Your are entitled to your opinions just as we all are.

I think the thing , At least for me, is that I do NOT believe Jodie to be an abused women, and actually see her negatively affecting truly abused women.
That may be why I myself cannot agree with your take on Jodie.

So the answer to your question as to "why more women who have been hurt or abused by men do not have more compassion for Arias as an Abused Women" is because they just do not believe (from their own experience with abuse) that she has been truly abused, but is using a deeply personal pain for her own selfish reasons. That of slaughtering a man , because he did not want her, and trying to escape the death penalty under the guise of abuse.

MOO
 
What is the evidence you have seen that proves Arias was never abused? I have no idea if she was or wasn't....the evidence hasn't shown me much except that she lied when she got caught...and I see that every day. I work with married people..and unmarried people...who lie when they are caught in much less serious things than murder.

She and the victim both sinned against the church....so what? That is not a lie.

Arias has some deep-seated emotional and psychological problems. That, I agree with. Let's see what her expert witnesses have to say. I just need to see more. Personal opinion only...

Her journal, her texts and her email, in her own words, prove to me that she is lying about being a victim of abuse.

Also, she never lived with him, had kids with him, was never totally dependent upon him, imo it was not an abusive relationship. They were in a friends with benefits arrangement, a consensual and mutual arrangement.
 
She has an astute vocabulary....but a flat affect.

She throws around $20 words from time to time, which does not make her Albert Einstein.

She also employs words in ways which indicate that she does not grasp their definitions.

She even makes some up from time to time.

Today she told us that Travis "sweared at her".

Some of us aren't impressed.
 
Shefner,
You are entitled to yourup pinion. You said you had been hurt, used by a man in the past. Most of us who have loved someone has experienced that kind of pain. But wait just a minute....men have been plenty hurt and used by women too!

I believe Jodi was the user and she most certainly was the abuser. And she was obsessive and possessive. And any of us who have been hurt eventually walk away...some of us run in the other direction! But she would not let go.

Would you really drive across the state of California to settle a score with your old boyfriends new girlfriend? That is what she did to Matt. Would you really, come on now, drive 1000 miles, turn off your cell phone, stock up on gas in gas cans, change your hair color and make up an alibi just so you could confront your boyfriend who has just told you in an email that he wanted nothing more to do with you unless you were obsessive? Maybe so. I think most of us would get a clue!

Finally, considering the above, and stealing her grandpas gun, and taking the knife, and having convenient memory loss, would you, out of passion slaughter another human being? I mean I cannot fathom doing that. Not possible self defense because once you have shot him in the head, or once you stabbed him in the chest and he is naked and down, you run with all your heart. Then you call 911. So you think we don't have compassion? Where is your compassion?
Like I said, you have every right to your opinion but if you can justify in your mind what Jodi did to Travis, <mod snip>

As evidenced in your response, I NEVER said I had been hurt by a man. I said I have been used before. I NEVER said by a man...so you are reading into what I am saying. This often happens. We hear or read one thing, then we feed that through our own translation process, interpret it our way and repeat another thing that was never said.

We have zero proof that Jodi stole her grandpas gun...or that she took a knife into the home. The prosecution has not proven that. It could have happened the way you say but it has not been proven. That is what the jury must use to make their judgement. That is all I am saying.
 
It would be nice if Travis could testify and we could judge how he sounds and looks on the stand giving his testimony. We could decide whether or not he is believable.

Then he could tell us whether or not he was a pedophile, an abusive boyfriend, a serial cheater, etc.

Alas, we cannot. He was murdered by Jodi Arias. Kind of convenient for all her uncontested stories.
 
JA did not write negative things in her journal because of the 'Law of Attraction' and because she claims TA read her journals.
This ONLY pertains to the part of her journal that does not exist that would state what she claims happened.
Then she spins around and starts reading quotes from her journal that are nothing but negative, and if TA ever saw them would only pose as manipulation towards him.
She is using the Laws of attraction to manipulate the truth away from this jury. Ex: "No jury will ever convict me" and continuous drivel since.

It's funny because even if that were true we have no evidence that he ever did read her journals, that he ever DEMANDED to read her journals, or that he cared at all. In reality, I feel Jodi desperately wanted him to care about her journals and everything else about her.
 
How do you know its a lie?

I agree this was a crime of passion...and I suppose it could have been self-defense. It is very difficult to prove and if Jodi had said that from day one, we wouldn't be here.

I am surprised that many of the women who have been hurt by men do not have more compassion for Arias. Not compassion for the murder but for more understanding about abuse and how it works.

I do not see the fear that I expected. That could be for any number of reasons. First, that she has not fear because she is lying...and that makes sense because she has lied a lot. Or...it could be because she is on medication. Or it could be because the threat is gone. I don't know...and I don't presume to have the answers.

I will step away now....carry on.

Hi friend! Nice to see you here. Sorry it is so heated!!! Everyone has been so immersed in this case and has seen, day by day, how jodi's story has been dismantled, how she has attempted to destroy Travis' memory with tales that cannot be substantiated and how Travis' family and friends have been devastated by this cand can do nothing but sit still and take it. So people here are at a fever pitch of disgust, extreme sadness for the family and just rage at what she is doing.

But no one should attack you. You are a doll and you're entitled to voice your opinion.

A couple of things though. One, crime of passion is a sudden act that occurs as a result of a sudden emotion precipitated by something that just happened or better, is happening. Examples would be someone walks in and finds their wife having sex with another man or someone comes home unannounced and finds the babysitter molesting their child.

The sequence of events as recorded by the camera jodi was using pretty much negates the possibility of this being a crime of passion. Seconds after the last photo of Travis, in which he is seated, naked, in the shower, he was being killed. There is really nothing Travis could have done or said in that position to allow for her killing of him to rise to the level of a crime of passion, IMO.

As to self defense, she has failed to prove that. Again, the timing as evidenced by the photos negates self-defense as does her own testimony. She basically said that a naked Travis lunged at her from a sitting position and knocked her over while half his body remained in the shower and still was somehow able to reach her a few feet away. It defies logic.

Her tale of how she ran to a closet (not out the door) to get away after wrestling on the floor, and then grabbed a gun she claimed he had (but no one else ever heard about, and one there was no evidence Travis ever possessed), and jumped up on a top shelf without using her hands, just her feet, and then ran around a charging Travis who was by then in the closet with her, and then ran back to the bathroom, again not out the door, as a naked Travis charged her with his hands outstretched like he was flying and head tilted at a super odd angle (to account for the trajectory of the bullet which was from the top right to the bottom left of his face) and that the gun just kind of went off and she can remember nothing else, does not prove self-defense.

There is also a principle in self-defense that you do just as much damage as necessary to get away or to survive, not more. The accounts of the ME and of jodi as she described, in the ninja story, Travis' death throes, show that after the first shot, Travis would not have been able to do much at all except die.

As to how women feel toward jodi, I noticed that at the beginning, there were quite a few, at times even a majority, it seemed, that believed her story could be true. Or at least, they believed that Travis was a scoundrel and I got the sense that many felt that while she should not have killed him, she might have been dealing with such a broken heart due to his emotional abuse, that she lost it. I also got the sense that most people with that position have been badly used and hurt by men, but that is just my sense.

Interestingly, the very vast majority (99.999999999%) of women posters who have actually been victims of domestic violence, not used, not victims of heart break, but actual victims of stalking, physically violent, controlling, scary perps, do not believe one word out of jodi's mouth.

It's not just that she shows no fear. It's that her stories of "abuse" by Travis have not a hint of reality to them. There is no connectivity. Even jodi can;t keep up the pretense much. She described days and days upon days of sex, with head downcast and soft tone and described how it made her "uncomfortable", but actually, mots of the time her direct testimony contradicted her discomfort. It was strange. She actually admitted to liking a lot of the sex acts during direct.

And the couple instances of physical abuse she testified to were not believable to people who have suffered physical abuse or know people who have (Like me. She is nothing like the numerous women I have represented in court in domestic violence actions). Then, JM totally refuted her tale of having her finger broken by Travis after she caught him masturbating to images of children. It was almost a Perry Mason moment.

Finally, there is no corroborating evidence that jodi was abused by Travis. None at all. :moo:

The one thing that stands out for me for premeditation are the gas cans and the shutting down of her phone and using cash only while in Arizona? Why would anyone go to such an extreme unless something wicked this way comes? I hope the jury will also keep coming back to that piece of evidence! They have not given me a plausible reason why she would go to such extremes to hide her trip before hand...she wasn't just covering her tracks! Therefore...premeditation...

Also, to add to that great list, the coincidental burglary of jodi's residence and odd theft of just a couple of items, including a rare caliber gun, an old computer of jodi's and, according to her, $30.00 of hers), while leaving several guns behind and other expensive items, in a break a week before Travis' murder with the same, rare caliber gun, a break in the authorities then thought was "suspicious" as there were no real signs of forced entry and the burglars seemed to target three unrelated items while leaving more valuable stuff behind.

Further, was jodi's rental of a car 100 miles from her own town, where she could have also rented a car. And then, how jodi demanded a car that was not red because she didn't want to stand out. Finally, the upside down license plates. All of that added to what you wrote above makes a very solid case for premeditation.

She has an astute vocabulary....but a flat affect.

I agree that she is intelligent. Considering she never graduated high school, I think she's bright. Also, jodi has been shrewd and cunning enough to get away with evil her whole life.

However, like most sociopaths and psychopaths, she thinks she is smarter than everyone else and that's what makes her stupid!!

OK, sorry....maybe that is so.

I have been used before so I can relate in part...and I hated myself for allowing it and for participating in it. For that, I have compassion.

People here are mercilessly cruel. To say, "Die *****!" is horrible for anyone to say to another human being...especially here at Websleuths. It shouldn't be allowed and I'm horrified. That makes us, in some regard, as no better than those who do these heinous things we see here day in and day out.

I hurt for both families. Its terrible that Travis died as he did. No doubt he used Arias. She let it happen and didn't stop it. Did she kill him out of jealousy? Perhaps. It seems logical. But they had been broken up and she was moving away...so why would she be so jealous at this point? Its very sad all around.

No outcome will fix anything. Alexander cannot come back and Arias will pay with her life...whether alive or dead. I do not think Arias will receive the death penalty....but what do I know...
Its very discouraging to see humanity in this state. I'm more disappointed in the bashing I see here than anything else. After hundreds of posts and countless cases over several years, I have rarely seen such.

Hi again!! I think there is great doubt that Travis ever used jodi. The only evidence that has not come from the liar's lips shows that jodi was the one who used Travis.

Yes, nothing will bring back Travis but I do find it interesting that often that statement is only made when there is some sympathy for the defendant.
And if we followed that sentiment in law, then we would have no need for prison and death sentences. This is not about bringing back Travis. It's about making sure a monster can never walk the streets again and to hopefully dissuade other evil people from committing similar crimes.

As to the bashing, I hope you will excuse the anger on here. It has been a long trial and those who have watched day after day have seen the horror of this person and what she has done to Travis and his loved ones. It is almost unbearable so emotions are running high.

I am not a nay sayer. I was referring to the leniency of the judge and the tactics of the defense. But if you prefer that I occupy a separate bench, so be it! Guess worries are not allowed on this bench.

No, it's okay to worry. I don't blame you. I was worried too at first.

But after hearing the sex tape, that was enough for me. Then came her sudden amnesia during the murder itself, followed by an immediate return of her memory, her lack of evidence of any kind of pattern of abuse, and then came the miraculous cross examination.

Don't worry. Unless one of the jurors is mentally ill or intellectually disabled, she will not walk, IMO. She may not get death, but she's never going to see the outside of a prison again. :moo:
 
and all this time I thought the word was Ravage?
isn't Ravish "you look ravishing"
She makes this crap up I tell you.........

rav&#183;age (rvj)
v. rav&#183;aged, rav&#183;ag&#183;ing, rav&#183;ages
1. To bring heavy destruction on; devastate: A tornado ravaged the tow
-------------------------
rav&#183;ish&#183;ing
/raviSHiNG/
Adjective
Delightful; entrancing: "she looked ravishing".
Synonyms
charming - captivating - enchanting - fascinating

Lol, that reminds me of "Secrets and Lies" when Brenda Blethin says at the restaurant "I'm ravished"! :floorlaugh:
 
And it's ignoring that Travis was the victim of domestic abuse. He's dead because of the same sort of controlling, obsessive, self-centered murderous behavior that kills so many women all over the world via domestic abuse.

I don't think the victim of abuse can be a stalker at the same time, can they? JA strikes me as a domestic(ly) abusive ex who turns stalker-killer. It's not a new story at all, and I hate that the gender thing seems to get in the way of seeing that for too many people :(

Gender blinds so many! I refuse to take a woman's side just because I am one. I have looked at all the facts and no where is there even a hint of abuse,except her abuse of him.I have seen many around and in my own family who used and abused the guys who loved them.None ever murdered any,but a few were just as bad as JA.
 
lol Mr Pizza and I watching JVM when they replay "you make my brain scramble"

His reply "so does the electric chair"
 
Hm... KN asked JA if she faked her O in the 'phone sex' recording and she absolutely said that she did.

But everything Travis said - that was all completely true, real and authentic and he meant every word. It is impossible that he was 'faking' - saying stuff to sound more naughty than he really was...

They really DO think we're stupid, don't they? That's a bit of a drag.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
173
Guests online
4,432
Total visitors
4,605

Forum statistics

Threads
592,486
Messages
17,969,567
Members
228,785
Latest member
Protocol136
Back
Top