Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The children were not going to be put in foster care, as RC was not involved in whatever issue the non-contact order was about, and she was deemed custodial parent.
The non-contact order was against SC only, and the only repercussions for him refusing it would be that CPS would apply to the courts to force him. Either way, the children would remain with RC as she would remain custodial parent.
First let me correct something, once again. It was not a non-contact ORDER. It is a non-contact agreement Legally that is a very different thing to speak of.
Second, what you say does not make much sense to me. If SC didn't agree to voluntarily go along with the conditions he was given, CPS would have to remove the children to foster care through a court order. Even if RC is not involved. CPS cannot force a couple to live separately, and cannot force a couple to divorce. Unless SC voluntarily agreed to remove himself the only way to separate him from the children by legal force would be to remove the children from both parents.
Make a bet? lol Yes they would have IF RC didn't take them and agree to the voluntary thing. Been there done it and I am sorry if I seem to question every post of yours but it is simply not true.
Make a bet? lol Yes they would have IF RC didn't take them and agree to the voluntary thing. Been there done it and I am sorry if I seem to question every post of yours but it is simply not true.
First let me correct something, once again. It was not a non-contact ORDER. It is a non-contact agreement Legally that is a very different thing to speak of.
Second, what you say does not make much sense to me. If SC didn't agree to voluntarily go along with the conditions he was given, CPS would have to remove the children to foster care through a court order. Even if RC is not involved. CPS cannot force a couple to live separately, and cannot force a couple to divorce. Unless SC voluntarily agreed to remove himself the only way to separate him from the children by legal force would be to remove the children from both parents.
Not sure how much rain they got near Golf Links & Craycroft/Swan (the wash that was searched > than once). The washes on northwest side were flowing! Hope that area of town got the same amount of rain. I pray the rain will come and unsurface any hidden secrets. I pray Isa is found and brought home to rest.
Praying you will be at peace soon Isa!
Again, then HOW is this voluntary? I agree that SC really had no choice, but I also believe he isn't being unfairly targeted.
Sounds more like there is something very very wrong in that family for CPS to rip apart a family who has just suffered the loss of a child......MOO but I cannot fathom why CPS would do this to a family who is innocent of any wrongdoing just to be hateful.
Thats ok, you're entitled to your opinion too!:rocker:
I know things happen, all the time, that aren't supposed to happen in regards to CPS etc...and it sounds like you've been the victim of one of these times...I'm sorry you had to go through that, it would suck.
This, however, is different IMO. I bet CPS weren't directly alerted by LE, in your case.
This has come out of an investigation of a missing child, and the only inference we can take is that there is some sort of abuse issue which has been uncovered in the course of finding Isa.
The entire difference here, IMO, is that LE REPORTED SC TO CPS. Lotsa caps in that sentence...but it wasn't an interfering neighbour, a disgruntled child...it was the Police who reported SC.
Further...your baby didn't vanish. What I mean by this, is this case is going to get a LOT of public scrutiny and attention. The departments concerned will be having their most senior people liaise to handle this one, simply because of the media involved. It will be done RIGHT, and not mishandled by some novice, or someone who's simply not very good at their job.
For these reasons, I think that personal experience with CPS, while horrible and unfair at the time, really can't be compared to what is going down here.
:moo:
I have a daughter near Craycroft and Kolb. They got quite a bit of rain today. Here on the far NE we also got slammed.
A 30 foot of mesquite in my backyard. Under it are a grapefruit and a lemon tree. Full sized. (or used to be!)
Just to clarify; I, too, think that CPS was going to take those boys if SC did not agree to the arrangement.
Calling it "voluntary" is like calling labor pains "discomfort"......It just ain't true.
And while I do believe CPS gave SC an ultimatum, I do not believe it was done without a darn good reason. MOO