CW
Former Member
Please continue posting here.
First thread link: http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=75578
First thread link: http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=75578
For what it's worth, given what we have at WFTV's link, you can't tell much about the LG email's validity. But while watching the corresponding video, I did a screenshot of what might be the original.
First, the PDF version seems to be a 'retyped' version, as it seems the original (if it is) is in all CAPS (both LG's and CA's portions). Anyone know if that is typical of either of their communications?
Second, regarding the 'funky date' in CA's email ("Sent: Fri,202120Nov 2008 6:18am"), I'm not sure exactly how it could happen, but "20" is the "hex code" for the "space" ASCII character. (You see this a lot in your web browser, when it encodes unsafe characters in URLS as %20). If this is what happened, I think we can assume the CA email was sent to LG on Fri, Nov 21.
Third, if this photo is the original, unedited email, it seems it was sent directly to KB of WFTV. But it's interesting (maybe) that it wasn't composed and sent to her directly by LG. LG's email was forwarded to her by someone, and the To: field and name after "Dear" in the greeting is missing.
I can think of two scenarios for this: 1. LG composed the email but wasn't sure to whom he was going to send it so he hadn't yet filled in that part, then later just forwarded his 'draft', or 2. LG sent this email to someone else who then removed the identifying information when s/he forwarded it to KB.
So... based on that, it's possible that LG communicated to LE and sent this in confidence to someone, never intending it to make it to the media.
Makes me wonder how he plans to pay all the experts for the defense, if he can't pay a $900 copy fee to continue getting documents he says he needs.
I don't know if this has already been posted but I found an old video (link below) re: one of the search warrants carried out at the A's..They took mostly clothes & said "hairbrush & comb", "toothbrushes", & "oral thermometer" were taken into evidence during an earlier search..Would LE retrieve these items themselves or would they ask CA to do it while they were in the home?..That seems very odd to me & now I'm not sure what to think about this whole hairbrush hoopla.
http://www.abcactionnews.com/mediacenter/local.aspx?videoId=10156@wfts.dayport.com&navCatId=99
Did anyone watch WFTV news at 11pm? Earlier someone posted that the station ran a teaser where Cindy said she wasn't scared of being arrested.
I don't know if this has already been posted but I found an old video (link below) re: one of the search warrants carried out at the A's..They took mostly clothes & said "hairbrush & comb", "toothbrushes", & "oral thermometer" were taken into evidence during an earlier search..Would LE retrieve these items themselves or would they ask CA to do it while they were in the home?..That seems very odd to me & now I'm not sure what to think about this whole hairbrush hoopla.
http://www.abcactionnews.com/mediacenter/local.aspx?videoId=10156@wfts.dayport.com&navCatId=99
I know this is probably known to all of you here who post regularly, but I have a question. Why does every topic have multiple threads? I logged on, clicked the "email" thread and while still reading it must've been closed. I wanted to reply to a post and couldn't 'cause the thread was closed. I went to the last page/post and it was stated that the same topic was restarted in another thread. Why are there multiple threads of the exact same topic? Is it a bandwidth thing? I'm confused. Why is there more than 1 thread for any particular topic? I don't get it.
It's probably easier to ask for those items than to tear the house apart looking for them.
But shouldn't LE be wise enough to know that procedure can easily lead to what MAY have happened with the hairbrush?
Good question. I would assume that they would need to ask about certain items that are not obvious...For example, a child's toothbrush is obvious. A hairbrush is not...They would most likely need to ask what brush Caylee was using, or which one was hers, etc...
Mods try to keep the threads limited to under 20 pages. Then they'll start that topic #2. Then 20 or so pages later they will start #3 and so on. It's easier to go back and research by doing this and people with slow internet connections have a hard time loading 50 or more pages. It's also easier for the mods to clean up and find something if they need to.