State v Bradley Cooper - 3/25/11

Cheyenne130 · Mar 25, 2011

snowshuze said:
Was Brad on the internet @ 2:30 in the morning? Might be why CPD/prosecution believes he killed her earlier than 4 am ?

Like someone has mentioned, it could have been an automatic backup. I have a program on my phone that backsup daily. I have no idea when it does but it backs it up to an online program so I'm sure there is activity. I almost never turn my cell phone off.

ETA: I would hope that the FBI guys that analyzed the phone were able to identify exactly what was going on. (Of course we won't be able to HEAR that since they are probably undercover. *GRRRRRR*.)

NCB · Mar 25, 2011

Any idea who the 4447 number belongs to? Was that Nancy's phone? This is getting curiouser and curiouser...

Just the Fax · Mar 25, 2011

This nonexpert witness was just giving a broad overview of the billing data and what the reports and codes mean. I assume an expert will be called to narrow down the suspicious calls / data that pertain to the case....hopefully in very plain black and white.

Albert · Mar 25, 2011

cygnusx1 said:
Would a Do Not Disturb mode on the phone cause the call to go straight to VM and thus end the seizure time thus creating a 1s seizure time?

Yes, this would have the shortest seizure time assuming the cell phone is located by the tower

JiminWilton · Mar 25, 2011

LyndyLoo said:
Here's the numbers I have collected so far..(How many phone did Brad have access to??)

Phone #'s ending in>
2723 Brads Cisco phone
1196 Brads Phone
1236 ????
4447 ????
/QUOTE]

Here's what I jotted down:
TIME CALLER CALLED
???? 1511 1196
6:34 1511 1196
6:37 1196 2001
6:40 1511 1196
6:45 1511 908 AREA CODE
6:46 ???? 1511

I'm guessing 1511 is landline?

cityslick · Mar 25, 2011

snowshuze said:
Ya know....it's entirely possible she DID hear something out of line from a juror <instructed several times daily NOT to speak to ANYONE about the trial> and felt it was the right thing to do to notify the court?

ETA: Jury tampering and juror misconduct are two differnt things.

She didn't notify the clerk though, she notified the prosecution.

My thought is it's not just about hearing talk about the case, but perhaps what was said was favorable toward the defense, which would explain why the defense objected on the grounds of trying to intimidate the jury.

Just the Fax · Mar 25, 2011

JiminWilton said:
LyndyLoo said:

Here's the numbers I have collected so far..(How many phone did Brad have access to??)

Phone #'s ending in>
2723 Brads Cisco phone
1196 Brads Phone
1236 ????
4447 ????
/QUOTE]

Here's what I jotted down:
TIME CALLER CALLED
???? 1511 1196
6:34 1511 1196
6:37 1196 2001
6:40 1511 1196
6:45 1511 908 AREA CODE
6:46 ???? 1511

I'm guessing 1511 is landline?

Click to expand...

there was a 6:05 also

ncsu95 · Mar 25, 2011

LyndyLoo said:
Awwwe TY..Cummings has a twin out there..LOL...

This is interesting, this def. expert is going to tell the AT&T expert how their system works..:floorlaugh: Maybe he learned the system from Brad??? who obviously was abit behind in the ability of WIFI to be tracked...???

This isn't wifi they are dealing with.

SleuthinNC · Mar 25, 2011

cityslick said:
I'm hoping we find out a little more detail on what the juror misconduct could be. I think the fact that it comes from JA sends all sorts of alarms in my head off.

Alarms went off for me as well.

caryresident · Mar 25, 2011

Just the Fax said:
JiminWilton said:

there was a 6:05 and 6:25 also

Click to expand...

Is there a way to set the home phone that if two calls come in at the same time then it will call back the second one (that being BC's phone)?

ncsu95 · Mar 25, 2011

Just the Fax said:
Talking about internet connection (data) from Brads cell on 7-12-08

2:32 AM
6:25 AM

Would an email notification sent to the phone generate connection data?

snowshuze · Mar 25, 2011

cityslick said:
She didn't notify the clerk though, she notified the prosecution.

Since defense stated the email was "vague" maybe she didn't exactly know what to do with her information. If it even qualified as jury misconduct?
I guess we'll all find out if it does, or not.

Just the Fax · Mar 25, 2011

So he was busted when he said he simply called his phone at 6:37 to locate it.
Guess he forgot about 6:05? Damn, I need to go back and listen to Kurtz's opening to hear his explanation.

jmflu · Mar 25, 2011

SleuthinNC said:
Alarms went off for me as well.

I thought it was a juror who contacted JA and JA contacted someone about it.

Cheyenne130 · Mar 25, 2011

Starting out with bench conference. Maybe the judge was informed of something during the break.

ncsu95 · Mar 25, 2011

Just the Fax said:
Yes,that is a better explanation.... and at 6:40 it just happened to be 8 seconds

Could be the difference in holding the phone (ie, he had it in his hand earlier) and not holding it while driving (6:40). I sure hope there is a smoking gun in here and not more stuff left to interpretation.

jmflu · Mar 25, 2011

And the defense didn't want to make anything of it. Don't be JA haters. She seems great to me.

Albert · Mar 25, 2011

ncsu95 said:
Would an email notification sent to the phone generate connection data?

I wonder if a data connection would have a seizure time associated with it?

Cheyenne130 · Mar 25, 2011

Thank you wral!!!!!

cityslick · Mar 25, 2011

jmflu said:
I thought it was a juror who contacted JA and JA contacted someone about it.

If that is true, why would they contact her and not the court?

State v Bradley Cooper - 3/25/11

New Member

Member

Justice For The Fisher's

New Member

New Member

New Member

Justice For The Fisher's

Active Member

New Member

New Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Justice For The Fisher's

New Member

New Member

Active Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

New Member

DNASolves

Online statistics

Forum statistics