Or confidential informant.CI = Criminal Informant
Or confidential informant.CI = Criminal Informant
CI = Criminal Informant
I can't get the video to work, maybe you guys can? Seems the media has caught up with WS.
12:45 P.M. UPDATE: Suspect in Sidney teacher's death served time in Florida
Read more: http://missoulian.com/news/state-an...fe-0019bb2963f4.html?mode=video#ixzz1jedylJqv
Unless the reporters know more, then the only similarities thus far I can see to the Dru Sjodin case, is that the perps. could have crossed state lines, and that a single shoe was found.
Absolutely... Especially in that part of the country. I hate to say it, but finding a buried body up there would be next to impossible, unless you know exactly where it is. All of the land up there is owned by someone, obviously (outside of the federal government), but often times it's pasture land... You wouldn't notice something out of the ordinary... and it's often rented out... A lot of it is pasture land (for cattle, livestock), and for crops (although not so much in that part of Montana/North Dakota... the soil isn't as fertile). Landowners up there definitely need to be on the lookout... But, I wonder where the "treeline" came from... directly from the suspects? That being said, the "treeline" could be anywhere.
Apparently DiFonzo doesn't keep up with how missing people cases are best handled these days. How a lot of attention can help immensly. How organized volunteer searches can help. I've heard of backwoods LE, but didn't think they had that in Montana. I've seen hillbilly LE in Tennessee that are way more on the ball than this guy. Just my opinion.This is a first-time event for our community, DiFonzo said, adding the national attention the case has received has helped in some ways. However, DiFonzo said authorities have wondered if the case has received too much attention at times.
http://sidneyherald.com/articles/2012/01/16/news/breaking_news/doc4f148483b95ac571867870.txt
Say what?
I can not imagine being told that my loved one "may" be deceased and yet no outside help other then property owners to search their own property. Really?
I know I said I couldn't form an opinion until we had something factual to work with and while true I do have a few thoughts about what certainly "appears" to be going on regarding the fact that Sherry's body has still yet to be found, much less recovered..
My thoughts on what it certainly appears is going on is that it the 2 perps for reasons unbeknownst to us are not willing or not able to assist LE in recovering Sherry's body.. I must say that is very concerning IMO because it doesn't mesh with one of the main speculations of what occurred to Sherry in that it was accidental initially with her being struck by their vehicle.. And then for further reasons unbeknownst to us they made the decision to take the injured victim with them rather than call for help.. This resulting in her dying from her injuries or from exposure wherever they chose to leave her or her body..
IMO if this is the claim and is what occurred(not exact but something similar in nature with it being initially accidental and not intentional) then IMO I can find ZERO REASON, EXCUSE, OR CAUSE FOR EITHER OF THESE MEN TO NOT IMMEDIATELY AID IN RECOVERING HER BODY!!!.. I could *possibly* buy or believe if there were only one perpatrator of this crime that for a combination of reasons they are having true difficulty in relaying the specific info of where or how to get to and recover Sherry's body.. Again thats just a *possibility* that I might consider be it only one perp.. However IMO that's not the case and there's just no way in hell-o that I'm believing for a second that both of these men cannot recollect enough specifics about the area they left Sherry or her body.. Not in a thousand years is it believable IMO that is possible for BOTH PERPS TO HAVE LITTLE TO ZERO MEMORY OF THE DISPOSAL!!.. Sorry I just don't and won't believe that..
So, what does that mean?? If the initial incident were accidental and she dies as a result of a decision they made.. Well.. They're charged with major crimes at this point and the cats outta the bag with LE declaring her deceased(to fam).. They're(perps) up chits creek without paddles and I can find zero legitimate reason for why they would not want her body recovered to prove that the forensics will show their acct is accurate and that she wasn't kidnapped alive/well with sexual motivations which then led to her death.. That is the logical and common sense route, right??.. It certainly is to me and with that said it does lead one to believe there to be a possibility that the motive was NOT as innocent as they "may" be claiming and/or that many are hoping/believing to be the situation..
And that's exactly where it leads me to in seeing that these 2 perps for WHATEVER REASONS are not assisting in bringing Sherry home?? Why do most think that they'd not be assisting if the motive were in fact innocent??
IMO there is just no way possible that both of these men have no memory of any specifics whatsoever with which to assist in Sherry's body being recovered and brought home to her loved ones so that they can lay her to rest as they so see fitting!?!?.. This is where my thoughts are at this time with what little we know..
Praying for Sherry's loved ones and that they will atleast have the solace of closure and beginning to grieve Sherry's death.. Hopefully very soon!
From the same article
During a midday press conference at the Williams County Law Enforcement Center, Williston Police Chief Jim Lokken said evidence in the case of the missing woman suggests she is dead and authorities are looking in Williams, McKenzie, Divide and Mountrail counties, as well as in northeast Montana, for her body.
Looks like they've added another county to the search list.
Thank you for saying that, because I had just gone back to google to look because I thought that was the case and the articles that I saw either didn't mention the counties or listed Divide.
I wonder why they added Divide?