Well I guess we have a lively debate going on in here LOL.
Regarding the CPR given by Rebecca.
The autopsy is quite specific that it is reported that she gave him rescue breaths and started CPR.
We are going with that as the facts at hand unless it is refuted by:
1. an eye witness
2. a written statement by Rebecca herself stating something to the contrary
3. Medical proof that she didn't.
Until that time there is no reason to continue going around about it. So, please move on from that topic. You don't have to believe it, but anyone that does not believe it has nothing to hang their hat on in terms of proving otherwise so the debate is futile. It is not reasonable to use it as any part of an argument because logic will be faulty.
Please turn down the volume in here and continue debating issues that are actually debatable.
A word to the wise:
If you are tired of going around and around in circles, then stop going around and around.
Thanks.
ETA: Just to clarify-We don't know if RN actually did or didn't give CPR and rescue breaths because there were no eye witnesses only her own account.
But until there is proof by way of a statement from her,an eyewitness that saw all her behavior from beginning until police arrived,or medical proof that there was no CPR or rescue breaths administered prior to LE arrival, then the argument has nowhere to go because we cannot counter her statements. So, we have to go with the facts from the autopsy because they are the only facts we have. fact is she reported that she did this and so there is nothing to support an argument.
hth