JLMcKenna83
LOL ≠ Lots of Luck
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 1,437
- Reaction score
- 30
I just have one question... WHO TRIED TO SAVE CAYLEE'S LIFE????
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I also found it quite funny that Mason had to read a written statement. They really should apply that to Baez too.
I wonder if it's possible that Mason put that restriction on himself - and this is meant with all due respect and not snarky on any level whatsoever - consider the possibility that he may be on some kind of blood pressure medication or his hearing aids weren't on or, oh that sounds like I'm being picky and insulting but i don't mean it to be. What I mean is, maybe he was using a written statement because he knew quite well himself that he may forget what he meant or needed to say, a way of controlling his own words. Oh, is that coming out right? I don't mean any disrespect. But I've long suspected he just doesn't feel well most days, and may be fully aware of it.
ooooooooooo SNAP !
I'm trying to figure out why these "self-aggrandizing media hounds" felt it necessary to call a press conferencer at all?????
I am seriously over of both of them.
What's with Baez and the number of boxes? I doubt that Conway got to see the 2 boxes filled with administrative info. He really does twist everything. So what's with the press conference? Does he always have to play tit for tat?
ETA:...and if everything was previously ordered...why the press conference?
And they said the motion is moot, but doesn't the motion still exists as public record. Wouldn't BC have issues with the content of the motion and what it has accused BC of. Where will BC go from here? You can't unring the bell. BC should be upset with JB trying to still make BC look as if he overreacted and that JB did not say what JB said. We all are misunderstanding his "legal speak"....lost in the translation I guess because I thought I understood exactly what he wrote. jmo
And they said the motion is moot, but doesn't the motion still exists as public record. Wouldn't BC have issues with the content of the motion and what it has accused BC of. Where will BC go from here? You can't unring the bell. BC should be upset with JB trying to still make BC look as if he overreacted and that JB did not say what JB said. We all are misunderstanding his "legal speak"....lost in the translation I guess because I thought I understood exactly what he wrote. jmo
I know THEY (hmph!) said the motion is moot, but wouldn't today's "meeting" have basically been an in camera hearing with Judge Perry issuing a NEW order based on these motions....so they wouldn't be "moot"?
In order for them to become "moot", wouldn't they have to withdraw their motions? :waitasec:
I know THEY (hmph!) said the motion is moot, but wouldn't today's "meeting" have basically been an in camera hearing with Judge Perry issuing a NEW order based on these motions....so they wouldn't be "moot"?
In order for them to become "moot", wouldn't they have to withdraw their motions? :waitasec:
Exactly!!! HHJP does his research and homework so he has studied the motions and basically held a motion hearing in camera today.
It sounds like the Defense strategy worked in as much as they gained some more ground, or at least they are going to claim it, in the spirit of things.
I wonder though if this will be an end to it and if they will get down to work or, like access to the tips -- they made their point and will never go near the records.
Even given access to make notes and additionally review the TES admin boxes there is still a LOT to process and, if BC had already been through them and didn't find anything of merit then what is JB going to gain?
He still cannot take the records to 'crunch' them and if if he tags a few targets .... it is very hit and miss.
I still think that the point and the Defense strategy was to taint the future Jury pool about things being hidden, fighting for access, unequal access, etc to seek out conspiracy theorists rather than anything to be gained from the records.
JB gained a LOT of press ..... lets see like the expert examination of the evidence if anything comes of this .....
I see, JB sees this as a conflict of interest even as the A's waived that conflict.
They can view those TES documents, they choose not to...I can't imagine making such a big fuss when this has been ongoing for some time already. You mean to say, they just had this revelation about the conflict. See they have nothing to defend ICA with so it's attack, attack, attack anyone and anything that they view as in their way...I still think this goes back to ICA and feeling betrayed. Placating her, as ususal...Trying to save a human life! What about Caylee's life???
Baez is going to get access to those documents and he won't stop until he does...but doesn't he have access and just needed to go the MNs office?? He makes no sense...IMO someone is letting Baez' stategy out of the bag..what a waste, a huge waste..he wants a notepad when he views the documents...hilarious and sad all at the same time..Cheney said they will have a hearing on the whole process..Cheny said it has nothing to do with Conway???? HUH????
I think something is coming down hard and this is Baez way of getting the focus off of him...JMHO
Justice for Caylee
What's with Baez and the number of boxes? I doubt that Conway got to see the 2 boxes filled with administrative info. He really does twist everything. So what's with the press conference? Does he always have to play tit for tat?
ETA:...and if everything was previously ordered...why the press conference?