I don't consider Levin's accusations conclusive proof---he brought up the same thing with the navy fibers. I believe Lin Wood asked that he produce the reports, and Levin changed the subject. Levin was fishing........it doesn't make sense that the fibers in Patsy's jackets were red AND black, and only red fibers found. They should have checked them against the fibers in the Santa suit. Fiber evidence is weak, and Levin knew it.
As far as I understand our justice system, until evidence is presented to a jury in a trial, it's not going to be conclusive proof of anything. Whoever is asking the question or writing the "letter of exoneration" seems to be simply putting their own spin on it for their own purposes, but nothing is proven by those in any case.
In Levin's question, he was presenting the forensic evidence and asking for Patsy to help him with any explanation she might have as to why that would be the case. Why would he not ask those questions, if those are the facts of the forensic evidence?
Lin Wood was doing his job, too, by obstructing the questioning, to protect his clients. Wood asking for evidence is completely a red herring, as well, because no investigator in the world worth his salt is going to hand over evidence in an open murder investigation to anyone, much less a suspect--except Lou Smit, Alex Hunter, and Mary Lacy, who will be remembered as conspiring with suspects in a child murder for all eternity, IMO.
I guess I don't get what it is the IDI expect of LE. You seem to resent any routine investigation or interrogation techniques that any LE agency would use in a murder case. Whatever resentments the Ramseys feel or felt I consider beside the point. LE is supposed to do a job, and if that hurts feelings or ruffles feathers, that's par for the course. How could it not?
That the Ramseys were and are so arrogant as to continue to belittle and obstruct any investigation that involves their input is mind boggling to me. I cannot and will never be able to understand how the family of a murdered child can be so petty, so selfish, so bent on defending themselves that in 14 years they have never set foot in the police department doing the investigation.
I can't understand it...unless they are guilty in some way. That's simple, common sense, and if the Ramseys don't like it, who cares? JonBenet is the one who was abused and murdered, and she has no choice in the matter, but they have always had the choice to quit whining and to help. The Ramseys should have had much bigger fish to fry than getting their feelies hurt by LE. Sadly, they never did, and they brought the full weight of suspicion on themselves because of it--they chose to block the investigation, no matter what their (endless) excuses.
So even if they were innocent, they still have no one to blame but themselves for the murderer getting away with it. No one.
And that continues to this day, if Burke and John Ramsey don't do new interviews with LE. And every other family member and friend asked for it.
But don't worry. I'm sure Boulder LE knows the lay of Ramseyland. So more than likely, it's all just for show.
