LambChop
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,160
- Reaction score
- 29
BBM - I find that impossible. If they had familiarized themselves with anything, they would not have messed up so bad on that stand. They would have their stories in order... they would be consistent.
For a long time, Cindy had stated (interviews) that George was the one who told her that detectives told George that Casey was not going to be coming back home on July 16th, 2008. For a long time, Cindy was not the one told that Casey wasn't coming home. In George's deposition, he states that he received a phone call, while outside of the Anthony home, from Yuri Melich and was told that Casey was not coming home. Cindy, for some reason, thought that inserting herself at the scene when this comment was made would make it more believable... unfortunately, John Allen was the one who told George and Cindy that Casey was not coming home. If you watch George and Cindy during LDB's closing statement, at one point, George and Cindy look at each other in disbelief and I believe they were muttering to one another "Did you say that?" and they both shook their heads that they weren't the ones who said it.
There is no reason, if they had watched and listened to all these recordings, after more than 2 years, that their stories would be completely out of sync. None of them, including Lee, could agree on who set up the jail visits! They all had a different version of how that happened. George believed he set up the appointment. Lee thought that Yuri Melich set up the appointment. Cindy didn't know who set up the appointment, but it sure was someone from LE.
I don't even know if the three of them even speak to each other outside of the eyes of the public.
John Allen claimed under oath on the stand he never told CA that. CA told the FBI in an interview in 2008 that when JA and AW left with KC he said if anything changes we'll let you know and CA then said no one called them they had to find out about her arrest on TV. CA, around that time, had said this to other's as well in some of their media interviews.
Also why would LE tell the family she may not be coming back when they are trying to find her missing child. The family calls an attorney and the attorney calls LE and tells them she has an attorney and they can no longer question her without him present. So I believe them when the detectives said they did not tell GA or CA that KC might not be coming back.
These people are still mad as a "Hatter" about there being no "Amber Alert" almost 3 years later. Never mentioned that it was probably not put out there because their daughter neglected to mentioned to anyone that her daughter was missing and it had already been 31 days. No useful information came from the mother that they could use because she was lying and continued to lie making it impossible to get enough credible information to give to the media.
If someone had told GA she might not be coming back GA or CA would not have waited to call an attorney. They would have called someone right away. The fact that neither one of them has their stories straight shows some brainstorming on their part. GA gets alot wrong and is very inconsistent in his statements. But when they all lie it's pretty hard to remember what the facts are suppose to be and as the stories change it's easy to slip into an untruth because it fits your purposes.
My guess is it might have been GA saying to CA, she might not be coming back given his emotional state at the time and it evolved from there. Sounds more like it to me. jmo