This is from the October 22nd 2012 issue of People magazine.
"I've had crying spells" .... oh really? That's it?? I'd be in the mental hospital, myself.
a mental hospital & a strait jacket for me, along with very heavy drugs! How can she be that casual about this!! Grrrrrrrrrr
So she'll talk to People magazine but not the police who are trying to find her daughter.
They have to look at the parents as suspects, statistically speaking they are the most likely perp. They have been unable to clear them as suspects, a year later and there is nothing to clear the parents? Looks like they have good reason to suspect them.
I agree. And that's why Lisa's parents have lawyers representing them. And I think that their following their lawyers advice in regards to talking to KCPD. MOO.
Thanks for the link Dewey. It's always good to keep an open mind and not automatically blame the most obvious people when things go wrong. Statistics only go so far.And it took 13 years to clear this mother, they didn't even get the cause of death correct in the beginning. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ing-daughter-gets-2-7-million-settlement.html
They have to look at the parents as suspects, statistically speaking they are the most likely perp. They have been unable to clear them as suspects, a year later and there is nothing to clear the parents? Looks like they have good reason to suspect them.
KCTV5.com plans to livestream the vigil tonight.
http://www.kctv5.com/story/19726738/baby-lisa-investigation-still-active-1-year-later
Among many other things, something I found unusual in this video is how Jeremy's family (who had never met Lisa) were up front with the parents, & Deborah's family (shown in pics with Lisa) were out in the crowd, or absent. Any ideas why that might be?
Guilt?
Among many other things, something I found unusual in this video is how Jeremy's family (who had never met Lisa) were up front with the parents, & Deborah's family (shown in pics with Lisa) were out in the crowd, or absent. Any ideas why that might be?