Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #180

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
girlhasnoname said:
That isn't what happened here. The very first copies circulated online didn't even have time stamps, might those have found their way into SM or friends hands before it was filed to the Court? Through some form of mistake, intentional or not, it was sent directly out by R&B, not marked confidential and was posted online before the clerk saw that it was Confidential/Protected material and could removed it from the site. I was here when it happened, I have strange sleep habits.

I know you said you haven't followed everything here so just wanted to offer that info. up.

moo
Click to expand...
That makes a lot more sense. I thought I gathered through discussion here that MW had a copy of the motion prior to filing, so maybe that is the source?
 
sunshineray said:
An oopsie with really no info that wouldn't have been discoverable. It doesn't poison the jury pool either as NM never went public with the information. He only filed for records that he'd already had filed for, withdrew that filing and the defense released it in discovery not long after. I don't see that as contempt. AJMO
Click to expand...
Apples and Oranges IMO
 
AugustWest said:
That makes a lot more sense. I thought I gathered through discussion here that MW had a copy of the motion prior to filing, so maybe that is the source?
Click to expand...
Welp, that leads us back to the vicious circle of why the Defense shared confidential and protected information in a highly publicized case including CS photos with a friend, who isn't even a licensed Attorney, he failed the bar and then denied it in Statement by Hennessy directly to the Judge in chambers meeting on Oct 18th.

MOO
 
girlhasnoname said:
Welp, that leads us back to the vicious circle of why the Defense shared confidential and protected information in a highly publicized case including CS photos with a friend, who isn't even a licensed Attorney, he failed the bar and then denied it in Statement by Hennessy directly to the Judge in chambers meeting on Oct 18th.

MOO
Click to expand...

Yet we are meant to believe with all this behavior that Judge Gull is simply biased :D
 
layer said:
Aha, the concern is that it is being used to circumvent the gag order. That makes sense. :)
Often confused, rarely insulted... and thankful that the technology to project sticks and stones through a screen is years away.
Click to expand...
Hah, I'm not a thrower of sticks and stones, just words sometimes but I hope I do it respectfully. :)
 
girlhasnoname said:
Welp, that leads us back to the vicious circle of why the Defense shared confidential and protected information in a highly publicized case including CS photos with a friend, who isn't even a licensed Attorney, he failed the bar and then denied it in Statement by Hennessy directly to the Judge in chambers meeting on Oct 18th.

MOO
Click to expand...
"Shared" to you and I is different, it seems.
 
photographer4 said:
Is it just me or is this a little late? Should it not also preclude the lawyer(s) for the D from speaking to the media as well? This judge makes no sense.
Click to expand...
I think since it's getting very close to jury selection JG is just reiterating for the record. Interesting that it doesn't include DH.
 
Emma Peel said:
How do you feel about crowdfunding without specifically stating that the funds will be used for Defense expert costs?

For example, let's say there's a crowdfunding initiative for RA's family, who are innocent, but suffering financial hardships directly related to RA's criminal prosecution. Crowdfunding on a simple platform, no mention of how funds will be held, distributed, tracked.

Does that solve the issue?

JMHO
Click to expand...
Hi, @Emma Peel. I have no problem with individuals or groups starting any legal fundraiser. If they want to use the money to pay a defense attorney or buy a new car or get plastic surgery, that is up to them. We see all kind of fundraisers for all kinds of causes.
I think it gets murky when we have an attorney working in an official capacity who is soliciting funds for trial purposes. In order to avoid an impression of impropriety, I think a fundraiser such as this should be at least once removed from the attorneys’ offices. MOO
 
layer said:
The order will prohibit prosecutors, the defense team and investigators from talking to the media about the case against Richard Allen.
Wasn't everyone here under the understanding that this was already the situation? What's "new" there? Did the old gag order expire? Gah
Click to expand...
Shocking false information again. HAH
 
layer said:
The order will prohibit prosecutors, the defense team and investigators from talking to the media about the case against Richard Allen.
Wasn't everyone here under the understanding that this was already the situation? What's "new" there? Did the old gag order expire? Gah
Click to expand...
Maybe the D and P are in discussions?
 
sunshineray said:
Maybe the D and P are in discussions?
Click to expand...
OMG, you literally made me gasp. Do you think that is even a possibility? Has this case been so tanked they'd be willing to make a plea deal?

I don't see it, but if anything, I have learned that just as soon as I say "I think I've seen it all", they show me what a stupid statement I've made.

Wow, now my mind is spinning Sunshine. I probably won't sleep a wink. :eek:

JMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Staff online

Members online

... and 222 more.
Total: 1,973 (members: 223, guests: 1,750)

Online statistics

Members online
223
Guests online
1,750
Total visitors
1,973
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
592,665
Messages
17,972,710
Members
228,854
Latest member
ramada.williams.gc@gmail.
Back
Top