Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because they are not all on equal ground. This kind of crazy has to do with being put under flight or fight stress over and over again. They usually turn inward and self destruct.If the army or the commander general or whoever else is to blame, then why aren't all the soldiers over there committing mass-murder of innocent civilians & children?
Because they are not all on equal ground. This kind of crazy has to do with being put under flight or fight stress over and over again. They usually turn inward and self destruct.
You can't keep doing this to people without them cracking in some way.
I agree. But overlong and too frequent tours are only part of the equation.
I thought we had learned from Vietnam the tragedies that result from putting young men into a combat zone in which it is impossible to tell combatants from civilians. I'm not suggesting this shooter didn't know he was shooting civilian children; I'm saying that the "flight or fight stress" must be nearly constant and, for some, unbearable in a guerrilla war. (We see similar problems among British soldiers in their historical engagements in India, Africa and North America.)
I'm not defending what this soldier did, what I am defending is all soldiers there.
They are all subject to the rules of engagement. These are the pressures our soldiers must meet in Afghanistan. In other words, it's maddening because of political pressures. I also believe the riots taking place over the koran burnings are instigated by Taliban. No proof, I'm just saying.
Afghan rules of engagement force U.S. soldiers to free insurgents caught red-handed.
Several Taliban detainees who had been captured in February after being observed placing bombs in the culverts of roads used by civilians and military convoys near Kandahar were fed, given medical treatment, then released by American troops frustrated by a policy they say is forcing them to kick loose enemies who are trying to kill them.
Despite what American soldiers say was a mountain of evidence, which included a video of the men planting the bomb and chemical traces found on their hands, there was nothing the soldiers who had captured them could do but feed and care for them for 96 hours and then set them free.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/news/...us-soldiers-free-insurgents-caught-red-handed
This story is a year old.
really? so when those abused children grow up to be rapists and serial killers, we don't blame them?
Company line? One rogue (press's word - undoubtedly reporting what's coming out from official sources) soldier:There were conflicting reports about how many shooters were involved, with U.S. officials asserting that a lone soldier was responsible. Witness accounts said there were several U.S. soldiers involved.
---
Neighbours said they had awoken to crackling gunfire from American soldiers, who they described as laughing and drunk.
"They were all drunk and shooting all over the place," said Agha Lala, who visited one of the homes where killings took place. "Their (the victims') bodies were riddled with bullets." (Reuters, most recent update)
While U.S. officials rushed to distance the apparent rogue shooting from efforts by a 90,000-strong U.S. force in Afghanistan.... (same Reuters link as above)
Shouldn't this be in the "Crimes in the News" forum? It seems pretty clearly a mass murder and not part of a military operation, whatever the underlying motives.
s
About all that's certain right now is that this is an act of terrorism committed by U.S. forces against the people of an allied nation. While we in the U.S. have apparently accepted the military account of this being the responsibility of one soldier, other nations are not quite sold on the veracity of that account at this time.
Company line? One rogue (press's word - undoubtedly reporting what's coming out from official sources) soldier:
I agree. I do find it a bit odd that the U.S. "rogue gunman" account is totally dominating Google searches now. Seems less like certainty than it does damage control. (Although if it's strictly the latter, I do understand.)I just have trouble thinking it is a drunk group with a 38 yr old staff sgt. Too much experience and rank to let that happen. Easier for me to believe snapped.
I agree. I do find it a bit odd that the U.S. "rogue gunman" account is totally dominating Google searches now. Seems less like certainty than it does damage control. (Although if it's strictly the latter, I do understand.)
Good info. Just curious as to why Reuters - which is top-notch - is still leaving the door open to more than one shooter (as recently as within the last hour).In some of the first articles they had some witnesses saying more then one and some saying just one. I keep checking even Aljazeera reporters are saying one guy went into 3 homes.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/americas/2012/03/201231163054684909.html
They might be on to something.Good info. Just curious as to why Reuters - which is top-notch - is still leaving the door open to more than one shooter (as recently as within the last hour).
I watched a show on cable about the mine clearing units. Every day they would go out in there big mine clearing tank. The whole time they are in that thing was pure stress and no chance of flight. What a horrible unit to be in.
If the goal is prevention, it is always better to look at the cause.
Behavior doesn't happen in a vacuum. Remove the cause, remove the unwanted behavior. It's basic psych 101.
So in the above example of child abuse, we can ignore the cause and continue locking people up or we can work at preventing child abuse and hopefully remove the behaviors all together.