Australia Claremont Serial Killer, 1996 - 1997, Perth, Western Australia - #15

[Canning Vale]

PCS,

Would you like me to prepare a list of old open rainwater tanks in the area near to the ampitheatre?
I'll write down the GPS coordinates and the directions to locate.

 

[PCS]

Cheers CV Thanks.

 

[PCS]

I am trying to quote BRE's astrological page of 7th December but this site bogs me down heaps.

 

[no name]

Hi all - new poster here. Does anyone have any info on the blue "Gemini" that was out front of BE's house. Who owned it? Did he drive it? Where is it? Did police look into where it is for testing etc

According to Trueblue VI - the Gemini belonged to BREs partner whom he did not meet until 1998ish

 

[no name]

Spooks, perhaps I didnt articulate the point I was trying to make well enough or you missed the gist of my post, but there was no suggestion as to the credibility of anyone's input, nor did I imply that I didnt/ couldnt understand, accept, or tolerate anything anyone proposed. I have no problem at all with comprehension.

From my observation's of late, a 'wot if' gets thrown onto the table (ie. a suggestion that a particular aspect of the crime may have occurred) then every conceivable 'maybe' gets thrown in to support it (ie. It might have happened like this, or maybe it happened like that).... And that's as far as it seems to go before the next 'wot if' is offered.

I have no issue with any particular 'wot if' or 'maybe'. Nor did our shared use of a word mean it was directed at you. I was motivated to post my opinion regarding the direction of the thread by responses to Hilo which suggested "thinking outside the box" to "rule out all possible theories".
My point was that I dont think the current approach is achieving that at all because much of the 'wot if's' aren't being posed in relation to any particular theory, therefore its merits via the 'maybes' not being discussed, thus making it impossible to rule anything in or out. That's what I think is "ludicrous" & and the reason I posed the question "where is it going"?

I posted my own theories simply to demonstrate I had nowhere left to go with them. I certainly didnt suggest, nor intend to imply, that my opinion was any more or less valuable nor credible than anyone else's & I'd be happy to contribute to anyone else's theory regardless of whether I believed there was any truth to it or not, if the scope of the discussion will allow it to get that far.

CV - Of the 2 other murders, 1 is a particularly sad case for both parties concerned. The details are not yet in MSM & its currently before the courts. The person charged is too young to be involved in 1996-1997 murders, so unrelated.
- the second was an elderly lady who met with foul play in her home so I think its most likely to be an attempted burglary gone wrong.

 

[Hilo]

I am trying to quote BRE's astrological page of 7th December but this site bogs me down heaps.

What page is this? - please forgive my ignorance...


JMO [emoji368]

 

[Annalise]

Thank you NO NAME for answering my post. That car would be long gone now but I thought it might have been around in 1995. I thought it would have made a good way of getting rid of a body if it was crushed for scrap metal. IMO

 

[Spooks-R-Us]

Spooks, perhaps I didnt articulate the point I was trying to make well enough or you missed the gist of my post, but there was no suggestion as to the credibility of anyone's input, nor did I imply that I didnt/ couldnt understand, accept, or tolerate anything anyone proposed. I have no problem at all with comprehension.

From my observation's of late, a 'wot if' gets thrown onto the table (ie. a suggestion that a particular aspect of the crime may have occurred) then every conceivable 'maybe' gets thrown in to support it (ie. It might have happened like this, or maybe it happened like that).... And that's as far as it seems to go before the next 'wot if' is offered.

I have no issue with any particular 'wot if' or 'maybe'. Nor did our shared use of a word mean it was directed at you. I was motivated to post my opinion regarding the direction of the thread by responses to Hilo which suggested "thinking outside the box" to "rule out all possible theories".
My point was that I dont think the current approach is achieving that at all because much of the 'wot if's' aren't being posed in relation to any particular theory, therefore its merits via the 'maybes' not being discussed, thus making it impossible to rule anything in or out. That's what I think is "ludicrous" & and the reason I posed the question "where is it going"?

I posted my own theories simply to demonstrate I had nowhere left to go with them. I certainly didnt suggest, nor intend to imply, that my opinion was any more or less valuable nor credible than anyone else's & I'd be happy to contribute to anyone else's theory regardless of whether I believed there was any truth to it or not, if the scope of the discussion will allow it to get that far.

CV - Of the 2 other murders, 1 is a particularly sad case for both parties concerned. The details are not yet in MSM & its currently before the courts. The person charged is too young to be involved in 1996-1997 murders, so unrelated.
- the second was an elderly lady who met with foul play in her home so I think its most likely to be an attempted burglary gone wrong.

Thanks for clearing that up.
Much appreciated [emoji2]


............................................
Posts are purely my own opinion unless otherwise stated with source links. All my original text and images remain exclusively my personal copyright.
[emoji317][emoji317][emoji317]

 

[PCS]

It is an astrological Book I have. It is really good.

 

[Annalise]

I was working in gugiery st the night Sarah went missing. Night shift at a facility there. It was a hot noisy night. The speedway was sooo loud. Hearing she had gone missing next day made me feel so sad. She would have been just down the road. When I saw video of mm I thought he could have been coming over from the speedway. I read somewhere he loved the speedway.

 

[Canning Vale]

PCS,

Here are a few round objects within the vicinity you mentioned. Hope this helps. CV

End of Falls Rd, at Richardson Rd T-Junction. Walk north a few metres	315225.12, 116065245	Round object without lid
Richardson Rd (west). Where road has a sharp bend. On property at north side of road.	315222.06, 116070997	2 tanks with lids
At Victoria / Owen Rd turn into Falls Rd, and travel north (1[SUP]st[/SUP] property on eastern side). Object located SE of round swimming pool	315240.47, 116075466	Round object (might be a trampoline
At Victoria Rd slightly north of the historic railway trail (not within a household property). Nearest Roads are a long distance (Bushlands Rd & Fernhill Pl).	31523302, 116063528	Round object

 

[Canning Vale]

I was working in gugiery st the night Sarah went missing. Night shift at a facility there. It was a hot noisy night. The speedway was sooo loud. Hearing she had gone missing next day made me feel so sad. She would have been just down the road. When I saw video of mm I thought he could have been coming over from the speedway. I read somewhere he loved the speedway.

Annalise,
Many thanks. That's helpful information. The phone box SS walked to on the corner of Stirling Hwy and Stirling Rd was a bit of a distance from the hotel.

Also, was it a factory you worked at?

 

[Annalise]

Hi Canning Vale - thanks for your reply. I actually worked in a nursing capacity with people living in a large house. I was affected physically and mentally for two weeks after her disappearance. I felt a connection to her somehow. I never told anyone until now. I picked up a lot of feelings etc.

 

[meticulously]

Metic,

You're a legend!

CV,

Not a legend , you must be thinking of some other sleuth ☺

Quote : Peter Gibson
"rules around flying drones were changing almost as quickly as technology was, and those operating them must stay abreast of the changes."

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2016-...n-remote-outback-searches-for-missing/7141574

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-10/how-drone-laws-apply-to-a-new-breed-of-high-flyers/8258908

http://m.digitaljournal.com/news/odd+news/drones-being-used-to-scan-for-dead-bodies/article/464185
.

 

[meticulously]

A little off topic ?
scientific stuff , not quite good enough unfortunately , nonetheless something some here may not know about .

"Scientists found detectable compounds even after 17 years of decay. "Even bone has odor,"

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Forensic-Soon-Electric-Noses-for-Corpses-039-Detection-45093.shtml

 

[Adrianna]

Has there been any news on possible court dates for the accused?

 

[petedavo.au]

Has there been any news on possible court dates for the accused?

October 25th.
Probably be the usual video link bring ups once a month thou. Which is customary when someone is on remand in a prison. That's by product of the English Habeas corpus Act that was to prevent someone being forgotten about in a dungeon A visiting magistrate would check on the welfare of prisoners and mark them off as having been sighted alive.

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

 

[Adrianna]

October 25th.
Probably be the usual video link bring ups once a month thou. Which is customary when someone is on remand in a prison. That's by product of the English Habeas corpus Act that was to prevent someone being forgotten about in a dungeon A visiting magistrate would check on the welfare of prisoners and mark them off as having been sighted alive.

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

Thanks, maybe we need to go back to dungeons for some of them lol

 

[Spooks-R-Us]

Thanks, maybe we need to go back to dungeons for some of them lol

Great idea!
Dungeons and occasional whipping for select prisoners.


............................................
Posts are purely my own opinion unless otherwise stated with source links. All my original text and images remain exclusively my personal copyright.
[emoji317][emoji317][emoji317]

 

[Canning Vale]

Thanks, maybe we need to go back to dungeons for some of them lol

My thoughts are... the authorities have a duty of care to the accused. Eventually, the Supreme court appearances will probably be highly protective and escorted by the police. That's to protect the accused from the general public. JMO