Thanks for that link, butwhatif?. It's a very interesting article on the area, which is something I personally don't ever see first hand, even though I live there.
A family member, along with other teachers, used to run a breakfast service at the school she taught at, and for a long time the money came out of their own pockets. She'd arrive at the school at around 7:30 am. She'd get there so early because staff found out a few kids would be waiting on the steps of the front office well before they had arrived. I know there were times when she or other staff members would stay back after school until well after 5pm or until whatever time it was that all the kids were picked up from school. Many a time I'd be walking past the school on my walk home from the railway station after work and I'd see her car in there and I'd drop in to say hello. These teachers didn't get paid for that extra time. They did it for the children, bless 'em.
I totally agree with Hooksy when he says, "It is not the area, it is some of the people in it... Only a small number are causing trouble. Most people love the area.". Most people I know around here have jobs and own their home (or paying it off). With the exception of the private renters I have living next door, all of my surrounding neighbours are fantastic and pull together if and when it's needed. I live here because it was cheap and it was the only place we could find a house that we could afford to pay off in 5 years. 10 years later, and we're still here. We may live in "The Druitt", but we're debt free and we live a good life. I consider myself lucky that we can live quite comfortably on one wage and I'm grateful that we're better off than a lot of people we know. Living here is the compromise hubby and I chose to make so that we could still enjoy life's little treats. People are often surprised when they find out where we live. I've never really understood that, as the area has a lot of fantastic people who have done quite well for themselves. There is a perception of it being a welfare area full of people who don't work. (FTR, I don't work and I'm not on welfare of any kind. Personally, I wouldn't be seen dead on it. I don't want to work, and the taxpayer owes me nothing if I don't want to work, that's my responsibility.)
Caroline Edwards has the same opinion as me and my friends when it comes to the baby bonus and welfare quarantining. Honestly, I always thought the baby bonus was a bad idea and I think it should be ditched ASAP.
Talked to someone who is often called in on these cases by the state coroner about this case tonight. He says these cases are so common we just wouldn't believe it, he also thinks the police will have an uphill battle proving this one. Said that without the body they've got problems because any evidence from the home can be explained away (true) and that all it takes is a good attorney with a mind to building his rep to come on board and charges go from murder down to almost nothing overnight. He said that all police make errors, there will be errors here, and that will be enough to start the dropping / lessening of charges, then he said that at this stage, there will be little of value left with her body of use to investigators, and that's if they find her which he doesn't think they will.
And this is someone who's been working in this area in Sydney for 30 odd years.
This is why my number 1 focus is on finding Kiesha....and why I said in an earlier post as each day goes by more evidence will disppear. That worries me.
COD is going to be a very important (if not the most important) factor in relation charges, let alone making them stick.
Arrests would be nice, but can wait.
FWIW, I was looking at the Princess Kiesha FB page again today, and someone posted that when the police and detectives were seen outside Robs mums house the other day, it was because they were taking the car for forensic testing.
No confirmation of this, but I really hope it's true.
I wish the police would continue to give the public updates, but not if could negatively impact the investigation.
Ooooh back to the car again. So Rob has said that he does not drive, did they own their own car, and did Kristi drive? Or is this his Mums car, and they think they may have used that, and Kristi drives?
Who drives, who has car access, how much and when?
(I also think it's quite possible that Rob's licence has been suspended, or he doesn't have one, but still drives as if he does. JMO.)