Eek, it's easy to get behind, look away for a second and....
molly hayes ‏@mollyhayes 33s33 seconds ago
He notes Dungey made reference in his close to fact that his client testified and Millard didn't. He says don't draw conclusions from this.
Colin Butler ‏@ColinButlerCBC 50s50 seconds ago
"An accused does not have to testify in his own defence," Goodman says explaining that Millard's silence is not evidence "in any way" #Bosma
Susan Clairmont ‏@susanclairmont 57s57 seconds ago
Crown must convince jurors beyond a reasonable doubt...Accused have right not to testify or not. Smich testified, Millard didn't.
Lisa Hepfner ‏@HefCHCHNews 1m1 minute ago
An accused does not have to testify in his own defense. Smich did, Millard didn't. Those facts are not evidence, judge says
molly hayes ‏@mollyhayes 1m1 minute ago
He says presumption of in innocence also means they do not have to testify. Smich did. Millard didn't--as is his right. #Bosma
Adam Carter ‏@AdamCarterCBC 1m1 minute ago
"... unless or until Crown counsel has proven guilt beyond a reasonable doubt," Goodman says. #TImBosma #Bosma
Lisa Hepfner ‏@HefCHCHNews 2m2 minutes ago
The indictment is a formal charge, judge says. The charge of 1st degree murder is not evidence, it's what they are accused of. #Bosma
Adam Carter ‏@AdamCarterCBC 2m2 minutes ago
"Every person charged with a criminal offence is to be presumed innocent..." Goodman says #TimBosma #Bosma
Susan Clairmont ‏@susanclairmont 2m2 minutes ago
"Presumption of innocence means that each accused started the trial with a clean slate." — Justice Goodman
molly hayes ‏@mollyhayes 2m2 minutes ago
Now onto presumption of innocence. Goodman says this means each accused begins trial with a "clean slate." #Bosma
Colin Butler ‏@ColinButlerCBC 2m2 minutes ago
Goodman reminds both men are presumed innocent until they proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. #TimBosma
molly hayes ‏@mollyhayes 2m2 minutes ago
Goodman says each one of them has an equal voice. Tells them not to defer to someone just bc they're a better note-taker, for ex. #Bosma
Susan Clairmont ‏@susanclairmont 2m2 minutes ago
"A jury's decision is a group decision...Notes don't make decisions. Jurors do." #Bosma
Colin Butler ‏@ColinButlerCBC 2m2 minutes ago
"A jury's decision is a group decision. Everyone has a say, an equal say." He says. "Do not defer to the best note taker." #TimBosma
Lisa Hepfner ‏@HefCHCHNews 2m2 minutes ago
The jurors' notes are not evidence; just help remembering evidence, judge says. They belong to the writer, but the decision is a group one
Susan Clairmont ‏@susanclairmont 3m3 minutes ago
Jurors notes they've taken throughout trial. Can take to jury room for deliberations. But they are not evidence. Just to refresh memory.
Colin Butler ‏@ColinButlerCBC 3m3 minutes ago
"Your notes are not evidence," the judge says, noting they can only use them to help make a decision. #TimBosma