www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0%2C9171%2C300661%2C00.html
o/t of Casey but interesting in regard to mental illness defense
I read the whole article. Completely fascinating. Yoder (the subject of the article) is indeed, a complete jerk.
Fascinating how HE, somehow, someway, has been chosen to receive repeated re-committments. He blackened an ex-wife's eyes, no doubt terrorized and intimidated many people with his ugly threats, but since when does THAT result in someone being locked up for years on end?
From what I could glean from the article, it looks like Yoder has been re-committed as "prevention". This is practically unheard of, though the public would gladly agree with it.
I have to admit, I like that. On a completely personal level, nothing to do with what is moral or legal for our society. If my father had been "locked up", or my ex-husband, I wouldn't have suffered their abuses. Even though they would have only been on the level of "black eyes" or emotional despair and fear.
I can also see and agree with the reasons "jerks" like Yoder are not (in general) re-committed over and over again. They are not "mentally ill". They don't meet the formal criteria for involuntary committment: Danger to Self, Danger to Others, and Grave Disability (inability to do the most basic self care activities). These are the laws of civil committment. In order to re-committ Yoder, SOMEONE is pushing the criteria to the limit.
The
possibility someone might inflict MORE black eyes on a spouse is rarely enough to incarcerate or commit someone repeatedly.
OK, I wish I was one of you who could just say it in few words, so I'll try here. It is probably a good thing that a society such as ours will not incarcerate a person who will PROBABLY commit further mayhem (only mayhem, mind you).
It would reduce the humanitarianism of our society, which I think is a good thing to maintain, even if a few destructive people escape the net.
Instead, we (the public) need to be educated about the presence and likely outcomes of involvement with people like Yoder (and Casey Anthony). To be able to recognize them and then avoid them like plague. To stay far far away because prevention is the best remedy. We can't rely on the system to protect us, we have to rely on ourselves to protect us from such disturbed people that the current psychiatric establishment refuses to call "mentally ill".
Thomas Szazs has some interesting points, I read one of his books when I was trying to adjust to being a psychiatric RN. My conclusion after 17 years of working in psych is that whatever the cause or manifestation, some people are so destructive that it's just stupid to get in their line of fire.
Just because psychiatry is unable to treat them does not mean their pathology does not exist OR does not demand some sort of treatment. We just don't know what to do yet. Just because our laws of committment or incarceration are too liberal to confine them does not mean there ISN'T something WRONG with them.
But we have no treatment, no solution, and must live with them somehow. So I believe it is on each of us to do this individually, a responsibility we have to take on with very little education.
So much for brevity
. I hope this makes sense. And, I hope that people like Yoder are NOT released. Or if they are, it becomes a culture-wide effort to educate the public about personality or character disorders. It's too easy to fall victim to them. Our children and other vulnerables are pretty much undefended against them.