afitzy
Former Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2019
- Messages
- 11,285
- Reaction score
- 126,553
I just watched the Lawyer Lee summary of the Contempt charges against MT and found her expanded and time stamped images from the L&C feed helpful in understanding the issue a bit better. It was interesting that the Lawyer Lee summary shows that MT had her screen strategically tilted both towards the gallery and imo al towards her attorney Audrey Felson/Felsen whatever her name is as I always forget and that the discredited Herman report was taken up and taken down over a period of time in clear view of the attorney sitting next to MT and even possibly by Jon Schoenhorn imo when he sat down at the Defence table. Jon Schoenhorn imo made a quite obvious "MISSTATEMENT" when he told the Judge that he was on his 'testimony cross' and so didn't see what MT had on her screen. I don't believe his statement to be true as there was a period of time when he was sitting at the Defence table when the MT computer screen was tilted towards her attorneys and he was seated and had a clear view of the screen.
Seeing the images of the MT computer screen tilted towards her attorney sitting directly next to her and also seeing the heads of her attorney seeming to look at the computer screen I simply have to ask:
WHY DIDN"T THE STATE INVESTIGATE THE TWO ATTORNEYS SITTING NEXT TO MT FOR THEIR ROLE IN THE REPORT BEING ON MT LAPTOP?
WHY DIDN'T Judge Randolph request that the two attorneys be investigated as part of a larger investigation as to how MT obtained a copy of the discredited Herman Report??
Its quite clear imo when looking at the images presented by Lawyer Lee that Attorney Felson/Felsen spends a good amount of time clearly looking at the MT computer screen and there was a time when Jon Schoenhorn was seated and had a clear view of the MT computer screen as well.
Why do we never see attorneys held accountable for their handling of the discredited report as the stolen FD copy of the Herman report was viewed and handled by: Attorney Michael Rose, GAL Attorney Michael Meehan, Attorney Norm Pattis, Attorney Bowman, Attorney Jon Schoenhorn, and Attorney Audrey Felson/Felsen.
WHY???????
Image from Lawyer Lee Podcast detailed above:
View attachment 493035[/ATTACH]View attachment 493035
Seeing the images of the MT computer screen tilted towards her attorney sitting directly next to her and also seeing the heads of her attorney seeming to look at the computer screen I simply have to ask:
WHY DIDN"T THE STATE INVESTIGATE THE TWO ATTORNEYS SITTING NEXT TO MT FOR THEIR ROLE IN THE REPORT BEING ON MT LAPTOP?
WHY DIDN'T Judge Randolph request that the two attorneys be investigated as part of a larger investigation as to how MT obtained a copy of the discredited Herman Report??
Its quite clear imo when looking at the images presented by Lawyer Lee that Attorney Felson/Felsen spends a good amount of time clearly looking at the MT computer screen and there was a time when Jon Schoenhorn was seated and had a clear view of the MT computer screen as well.
Why do we never see attorneys held accountable for their handling of the discredited report as the stolen FD copy of the Herman report was viewed and handled by: Attorney Michael Rose, GAL Attorney Michael Meehan, Attorney Norm Pattis, Attorney Bowman, Attorney Jon Schoenhorn, and Attorney Audrey Felson/Felsen.
WHY???????
Image from Lawyer Lee Podcast detailed above:
View attachment 493035[/ATTACH]View attachment 493035
Last edited: