Unfortunately, none of the media seems to have even read the new Summary Report Dina and her lawyer put out. It's a shame because they could ask them some key questions about such a serious matter instead of writing it up this way.
I watch Dr. Drew last night and basically I thought he did a pretty good job. He sympathized with Dina and though Max's death should be investigated. I thought Dina looked very uncomfortable though when Drew brought up Rebecca's death and said they both should be investigated. Ann Bremer reiterated that both should be investigated. We have never heard anyone from Dina's end say Rebecca's death should be looked into... I hope she thinks again about this after Drew making such a point of none of this makes sense - to have these two deaths in just a couple of days time.
If Dina really wants the truth of it all, especially about Max's death then I think she also would be calling for an investigation of both deaths.
I would be extremely surprised if Dina were telling the truth on Dr. Drew when she claimed she did not know how serious Max's condition was until the day after Rebecca died or even Friday. I don't know where to find it but her version of CPS being involved does not seem to jive and neither do a number of other things like Nina calling Rebecca late at night and Rebecca being immediately forbidden from going to the hospital.
LE has already said the death of RZ is closed. Whether it will be re-opened isn't up to Dina or Dr. Drew. Her focus is on her son's death and I don't blame her for any part of it.
Whether Dina is telling the truth about when she became aware of the severity of Max's injuries is irrelevant. She may have been in denial to the very end. As the child's mother, she had every right to forbid someone from the bedside of her beloved son and if she thought that person was harmful to her son, she had every right to report it to CPS.
JMO
I hope it also results in the Zahaus suing for wrongful death. OJ wasn't convicted by a criminal jury but the civil jury, which got to see a lot more evidence, found him responsible for the two deaths. Ironically, DS' PR team making this front-page news, trying to contaminate a jury pool before the investigation is even reopened, may backfire. Here they are, all over the web and the media, smearing a woman who was the victim and I hope that means all these media appearances will start to uncover a lot more questions that the Coronado police didn't ask. Of the Shacknais, and IIRC, there were at least four of them in town at the time, plus additional people in the guesthouse.
Max was declared brain dead, and subsequently his organs were donated. I presume both parents would have to agree to that. So it would appear this was a planned disconnection of life support.
I hope it also results in the Zahaus suing for wrongful death. OJ wasn't convicted by a criminal jury but the civil jury, which got to see a lot more evidence, found him responsible for the two deaths. Ironically, DS' PR team making this front-page news, trying to contaminate a jury pool before the investigation is even reopened, may backfire. Here they are, all over the web and the media, smearing a woman who was the victim and I hope that means all these media appearances will start to uncover a lot more questions that the Coronado police didn't ask. Of the Shacknais, and IIRC, there were at least four of them in town at the time, plus additional people in the guesthouse.
LE has already said the death of RZ is closed. Whether it will be re-opened isn't up to Dina or Dr. Drew. Her focus is on her son's death and I don't blame her for any part of it.
Whether Dina is telling the truth about when she became aware of the severity of Max's injuries is irrelevant. She may have been in denial to the very end. As the child's mother, she had every right to forbid someone from the bedside of her beloved son and if she thought that person was harmful to her son, she had every right to report it to CPS.
JMO
I'd like to point out that impulsivity isn't limited to suicide. Murderers are also known to be impulsive-- a great deal of them in under 5 minutes. Intent can be formed in the blink of an eye. And sometimes something that may not have started out to be a murder, ends up being murder due to impulsivity. And sometimes it's planned as a murder from the beginning of the confrontation or incident,
If Rebecca had committed suicide indoors, it may have taken longer to find her.
If Rebecca was murdered indoors, it may have taken a longer time to find her.
The debate cannot be won.
There is no way to prove, imo, what happened in either death at this point. I doubt that either case will be reopened. What is of particular importance to Dina at this point is establishing some aspect of negligence, imo, so that the next phase of her quest for justice can occur. And I believe that part of her quest for justice will include a civil lawsuit against Jonah in the next few months to a year or so.
Dr. Meliek is a prominent forensic pathologist, but no pathologist can say from the injury pattern of a victim who may or may not have been present when those injuries occurred. That is for law inforcement investigators to determine. ME's conclude homicide, suicide, accident, or undetermined-- but forensic pathologists don't typically name specific suspects in autopsy reports. In a criminal trial, those statements would be torn to bits-- but she is free to make those statements in a report she was paid to produce. That is why her comments are being criticized. She may reach different medical conclusions than the original ME, and that is fair. But when she starts naming suspects, she has stepped over a professional line.
I thought she said on Dr. Drew last night that the main doctor in the unit contacted CPS because he didnt believe it was an accident?
If Max's case is reopened this doctor's early opinion will be very relevant.
IMO
I think Dina is quickly realizing that presenting all this in the media means the media will give some or equal time to Rebecca's death. Oddly, I don't think that's what she thought was going to happen. I think if you have a strong case and nothing else has worked then going to the media is appropriate. However, that is not the case here. It appears as if the SDSD has already said they will look over the findings.
Ann Bremer has said she thinks they will get some results from the CA Attorney General - their request was to look into both cases. Dina sits on the shows and barely seems to acknowledge Rebecca's death - that is going to seem odd to people when the Zahau's own attorney has gone all the way to the AG to request they both be looked at while Dina is making a media splash with lawsuits, a new nonprofit, and just going to the SDSD now with a expert report when we never heard previously that her team requested access to the mansion for investigation or asked for a second autopsy.
<snipped and agree with what you said>
Dr. Meliek is a prominent forensic pathologist, but no pathologist can say from the injury pattern of a victim who may or may not have been present when those injuries occurred. That is for law inforcement investigators to determine. ME's conclude homicide, suicide, accident, or undetermined-- but forensic pathologists don't typically name specific suspects in autopsy reports. In a criminal trial, those statements would be torn to bits-- but she is free to make those statements in a report she was paid to produce. That is why her comments are being criticized. She may reach different medical conclusions than the original ME, and that is fair. But when she starts naming suspects, she has stepped over a professional line.
I think Dina is quickly realizing that presenting all this in the media means the media will give some or equal time to Rebecca's death. Oddly, I don't think that's what she thought was going to happen. I think if you have a strong case and nothing else has worked then going to the media is appropriate. However, that is not the case here. It appears as if the SDSD has already said they will look over the findings.
Ann Bremer has said she thinks they will get some results from the CA Attorney General - their request was to look into both cases. Dina sits on the shows and barely seems to acknowledge Rebecca's death - that is going to seem odd to people when the Zahau's own attorney has gone all the way to the AG to request they both be looked at while Dina is making a media splash with lawsuits, a new nonprofit, and just going to the SDSD now with a expert report when we never heard previously that her team requested access to the mansion for investigation or asked for a second autopsy.
BBM - exactly. If Dr. Meliek did claim in her report she concluded Rebecca was a murderer or even directly involved in an assault/Max's death then she is being unethical and going beyond her professional expertise as a pathologist.
What I find unconscionable is lame bashing of the boy's mother. She's a victim. Your contention that her actions are somehow to blame for her son's death greatly lacks any basis to support it.
I don't know of any divorce where an ex-spouse can order the other parent to hire a nanny or in any way intrude upon his time with his child just because she doesn't like his new girlfriend. The public has not been given any basis whatsoever to conclude that RZ was in any way a violent person and her own statements to LE indicated she was not alone in the house at the time of Max's death.
JMO
BBM - exactly. If Dr. Meliek did claim in her report she concluded Rebecca was a murderer or even directly involved in an assault/Max's death then she is being unethical and going beyond her professional expertise as a pathologist.
Maybe somebody can explain this to me. The whole basis for the claim that he couldn't get over this railing is because his center of gravity was below the railing. Well, if you couldn't get over something higher than your center of gravity, what in the world was I doing watching high jumps at the Olympics?
Are they taking into account the momentum this child could have if he was running and tripped over something, for instance?
Thank you for making my point.