Sophie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
- Messages
- 1,033
- Reaction score
- 106
I'm sorry to start a thread but I can't find the thread where we discussed Dr Lee's findings on the tape on JBR's mouth and Dr Lee's book more generally. Apologies.
Anyway, this book arrived today and I have just started reading it. Flicked forward to the tape section and his opinion isn't as strong as I remembered. He says that it was a visual match to tape attached to paintings in the Ramsey house and that this tape could be purchased in Boulder. It wasn't an exact scientific match to those paintings, but another painting was removed from the Ramsey house by Pam so...
However, I have found a reference to an interview with Dr Lee in which he discusses the case and suggests that the tape had been usedpreviously. I will try to find this but have to admit that he isn't 100% assertive in his book.
Not quite on point but there's an interesting 'error' in the book: he says that JAR was at the Ramsey house on Christmas Day. I know received wisdom is that JAR was the best part of a continent away but it's an interesting error in view of some posters' views on JAR.
Will have more to say as I read more of the book but a cursory glance proves that IDI are wrong when they claim that Lee was an RDI hired gun. He is actually quite critical in places of the police and only just falls short of laughing at ST and the 25th Dec on the headstone. IMHO he makes the mistake of thinking that ST saw that as evidence as opposed to a circumstantial clue but it does prove that he wasn't some sort of police drone.
Anyway, this book arrived today and I have just started reading it. Flicked forward to the tape section and his opinion isn't as strong as I remembered. He says that it was a visual match to tape attached to paintings in the Ramsey house and that this tape could be purchased in Boulder. It wasn't an exact scientific match to those paintings, but another painting was removed from the Ramsey house by Pam so...
However, I have found a reference to an interview with Dr Lee in which he discusses the case and suggests that the tape had been usedpreviously. I will try to find this but have to admit that he isn't 100% assertive in his book.
Not quite on point but there's an interesting 'error' in the book: he says that JAR was at the Ramsey house on Christmas Day. I know received wisdom is that JAR was the best part of a continent away but it's an interesting error in view of some posters' views on JAR.
Will have more to say as I read more of the book but a cursory glance proves that IDI are wrong when they claim that Lee was an RDI hired gun. He is actually quite critical in places of the police and only just falls short of laughing at ST and the 25th Dec on the headstone. IMHO he makes the mistake of thinking that ST saw that as evidence as opposed to a circumstantial clue but it does prove that he wasn't some sort of police drone.