AngelWings444
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 5,066
- Reaction score
- 7
I don't consider it "mudslinging" when the biological father wanted custody, the evaluator said he should have custody, because the child would suffer harm if Mom had custody, and then it HAPPENS! I say that was a correct assessment! The only "normal" life Cherish had was when she was in the custody of her Daddy!
Again, the father was NOT THERE, he did not have anything to do with this! If he had custody, this would not have happened. <modsnip>.
The "chain of events" happened when the bio MOM got in the van of a registered sex offender. Then, allowed her daughter to leave Walmart with a RSO. These children were all in danger due to the actions of the Mom, who set off the "chain of events".
None of this would have happened if Cherish was with her Dad!
Blame the RSO and the mother all you want, <modsnip>. He did nothing wrong! In fact, he did everything right...he is the only one who did. Billy is BLAMELESS! JMO
Again, the father was NOT THERE, he did not have anything to do with this! If he had custody, this would not have happened. <modsnip>.
The "chain of events" happened when the bio MOM got in the van of a registered sex offender. Then, allowed her daughter to leave Walmart with a RSO. These children were all in danger due to the actions of the Mom, who set off the "chain of events".
None of this would have happened if Cherish was with her Dad!
Blame the RSO and the mother all you want, <modsnip>. He did nothing wrong! In fact, he did everything right...he is the only one who did. Billy is BLAMELESS! JMO