Filly
KICKING AND SHINING
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2007
- Messages
- 20,531
- Reaction score
- 18,039
This poor little one. We can only pray right now she is safe.
However, the camera was for multi use. The living room set up and the day care set up may be completely seperate. It looks that way. So who owned the camera? Day Care workers OR family of the poor child?
Of course I know this isn't CSI or anything, but can't they zoom in on writing on something somewhere? I guess not or they would have.
The photo of the little kids singing or whatever they are doing I am not sure it's Christmas. Only one child has on anything Christmas related. No matter the socio economic background I'd think that the kids would at least have on a button or something Christmas like. Then again a kid in the picture has a red sweatshirt.
The article states point blank sexual abuse, and possibly it's family abuse. Throw in family in transition and again we have to pray.
However, the camera was for multi use. The living room set up and the day care set up may be completely seperate. It looks that way. So who owned the camera? Day Care workers OR family of the poor child?
Of course I know this isn't CSI or anything, but can't they zoom in on writing on something somewhere? I guess not or they would have.
The photo of the little kids singing or whatever they are doing I am not sure it's Christmas. Only one child has on anything Christmas related. No matter the socio economic background I'd think that the kids would at least have on a button or something Christmas like. Then again a kid in the picture has a red sweatshirt.
The article states point blank sexual abuse, and possibly it's family abuse. Throw in family in transition and again we have to pray.