Sustained
Justice for Stacy
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2008
- Messages
- 2,678
- Reaction score
- 6,656
? Is there more info on BA's brother?
Sorry Wendy ... who's BA ?
? Is there more info on BA's brother?
BA = Brendan Dassey. Just probably simple confusion getting their names straight.Sorry Wendy ... who's BA ?
I have one more to add that is the strongest thing to lead me to believe that ALL the evidence was planted. I also do not believe that anyone other than LE planted anything. That does not mean I think LE killed her (though, that is not completely off the table for me), but that something happened to her and LE discovered her at a time they REALLY needed to take SA down.
12) SA would not have committed a murder when everything in his life was looking up to the degree it was. He was in the middle of a $36 million civil suit. He probably wouldn't have gotten that much, but he would have gotten a pretty penny still. He was being paraded around by influential people, such as gov's and such, they were naming a bill after him. He had dinners planned for him (such as the Innocence Project dinner he was scheduled to go to, the one that LE mocked he wouldn't be going to while they were searching his house).
There is waaaaaaay too much wrong with these cases on a whole, for it to be coincidence. You do not deviate from so many protocol's as they did without it all being a stinky pile of fish. Their mistake was that they felt safe enough to do all this without being able to look into the future and see just how thoroughly everything about these cases would be dissected and examined by so many capable people. Their complete arrogance is what set them up for this fall they are now feeling and I believe Zellner will be bringing this whole house of cards down in the near future. IMHO. I, for one, cannot wait to see how this all plays out, as my husband thinks I am a complete nutjob right now, because this is ALL I talk about. I am looking forward to the day I can go back to being just my normal self and start focusing more on my everyday life. He is looking forward to that day too, LOL.
I'm also thinking re: possible planting of evidence.
Maybe the LE didn't want to be made a fool of again (after the rape case) after they suspected him so they planted the evidence to "ensure" there would be enough for a conviction? (or enough that someone would have some doubts about his innocence) Just a thought.
I agree that a guilty man would not want more forensic evidence dug up because it would definitely link them. Although SA shouldn't have to worry because he did such a good job getting every piece of hair and rope fibres out of the room. :crazy:
The prosecution is wrong about where Teresa was shot (in the garage). There's no doubt in my mind about that. No evidence in the garage ... likely no crime committed there. JMHO
right! and if there is no evidence of her being shot in the garage.... how did a bullet get in there with her DNA?
The bullet could have been in there.... the test showing it had TH's DNA was contaminated or the bullet was placed in there by LE with TH's DNA, or the bullet was placed in there by LE with no DNA and it got contaminated in the lab.
No evidence of someone being shot in the garage ..... and then a magic bullet showing up with DNA on it? I mean... it kinda feeds the theory that they planted evidence, doesn't it?
This isn't even mentioning the fact that the bullet probably should not have exited her skull if it entered according to everything I have read. I am not sure why this was not mentioned or brought up during the trial, on either side. Well, I can see why the prosecution wouldn't bring it up... but the defense?
I am not sure about posting rules but, here goes as I do not know how to search for previous years of news articles:
This is an enlightening and mind-blowing (kinda getting use to this when it comes to these cases...what ISN"T mind-blowing,smh) discussion I saw and wanted to share here.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MakingaMur...sly_attempt_by_halbachs_family_and_attorneys/
"
Herald Times Reporter
June 1, 2006
Letter to the editor: Legal system is crooked with regards to Avery
What kind of cockeyed legal hocus-pocus is this?
On the one hand, a judge rules that a man no longer qualifies for a public defender, due to the fact that he has funds to defend himself.
Now we have a lawsuit, which is trying to prevent those funds from being used for his defense. The lawsuit is based on the pre-jury-trial supposition that Steve Avery is guilty of murder.
Supposedly in the American system of jurisprudence, a man is innocent until proven guilty. But Steve Avery's guilt or innocence has yet to be determined in a court of law.
Such a lawsuit should not even be allowed consideration until after the jury trial has been completed. This is unless of course, everybody's minds are already made up and the jury trial is nothing more than a big show.
May God help anybody who is ever caught up in a crooked legal system like this. "