GA - Jennifer Wilbanks, runaway bride, for false police report, Duluth, 2005

While I am glad Jennifer is alive and safe, I have to say that this is probably the most selfish thing she could've done. I have no sympathy for this girl but truly feel sorry now for her fiance and their families. Especially since the fiance was under suspicion and all the turmoil the families went through.

This girl truly has issues and behaved like a selfish drama-queen. The fact that she took off at night saying she was going jogging, she obviously WANTED people to think something terrible had happened. She left w/o her car, ID, credit cards, etc. This was purposeful on her part. Then when she finally called 911 and told them she'd been abducted and didn't admit the truth until further question by police, it's just wrong. I don't care what kind of "mental" problems she has, she should not have done this. If she was having 2nd thoughts about the marriage, she should've confided in someone but instead created this huge drama, an obvious chicken- way out. All the money that was spent looking for her is ridiculous not to mention the money spent on this wedding. She should be held accountable for something because she deliberately tried to make it look like she was abducted until she cracked under pressure - just like the college girl in WI. Jennifer needs to be held accountable for her actions that hurt so many and she needs professional help.
 
Tigerlily said:
She should be held accountable for something because she deliberately tried to make it look like she was abducted until she cracked under pressure - just like the college girl in WI.
My first thought. Audrey Seiler (sp?), does anyone know if she was ever billed for all the search efforts? I heard some talk about it.

I have a friend who went to the same high school as Audrey and lives near her in Rockford. She says Audrey didn't go back to college in Wisconsin, she lives at home and doesn't really do much anymore. She goes to therapy a lot.
 
Before people start bashing this girl, think about it..........

She had a HUGE wedding that she had been focusing on for a long time. She forgot about the MARRIAGE part, it finally hit her and she split. Whose to say that Candlelight wasn't on to something, maybe he was leading a double life and she caught onto it and was too embarrassed to admit it to her family. I'm sure there's a lot more going on behind the scenes than anyone here knows about. It just goes to show you, don't be so quick to rush judgement on someone (like some insisted on doing with JM in this case). ;)
 
Yeah said:
Before people start bashing this girl, think about it..........

She had a HUGE wedding that she had been focusing on for a long time. She forgot about the MARRIAGE part, it finally hit her and she split. Whose to say that Candlelight wasn't on to something, maybe he was leading a double life and she caught onto it and was too embarrassed to admit it to her family. I'm sure there's a lot more going on behind the scenes than anyone here knows about. It just goes to show you, don't be so quick to rush judgement on someone (like some insisted on doing with JM in this case). ;)
Sorrie. All those things may be true, however, it does NOT justify her behavior, in any way, shape or form.

This woman has issues. If she suspected her fiance of something, and she didn't have ONE PERSON she felt she could confide in, that THIS was the ONLY thing she could "do" then, that's a BIG problem there.

Sounds more like narcissistic behavior, to me.
 
Yeah said:
Before people start bashing this girl, think about it..........

She had a HUGE wedding that she had been focusing on for a long time. She forgot about the MARRIAGE part, it finally hit her and she split. Whose to say that Candlelight wasn't on to something, maybe he was leading a double life and she caught onto it and was too embarrassed to admit it to her family. I'm sure there's a lot more going on behind the scenes than anyone here knows about. It just goes to show you, don't be so quick to rush judgement on someone (like some insisted on doing with JM in this case). ;)

That's no excuse. It might make it okay for the original act of running away, but after a couple of hours, wouldn't you at least call your mom or a friend or even someone's voicemail at work (when you knew they wouldn't be there to answer) and let them know that you hadn't been abducted?

They thought she was being raped/tortured/murdered somewhere by God-knows-who or that maybe JM had killed and dumped her like DRIP or MH. You can't tell me she never thought of that. Has she been living under some rock for the past 2 years? Can you imagine the agony her family has been going through and she allowed that? She created it?

I understand panic, I understand pressure, I understand being overwhelmed. But allowing JM to become a murder suspect and your own mother to visit the brink of mental breakdown at the thought of your death is too much.

Calling this cold feet is the understatement of the century.
 
Sprocket said:
Sorrie. All those things may be true, however, it does NOT justify her behavior, in any way, shape or form.

This woman has issues. If she suspected her fiance of something, and she didn't have ONE PERSON she felt she could confide in, that THIS was the ONLY thing she could "do" then, that's a BIG problem there.

Sounds more like narcissistic behavior, to me.

I agree about the narcissistic behavior.
 
Yeah said:
Before people start bashing this girl, think about it..........

She had a HUGE wedding that she had been focusing on for a long time. She forgot about the MARRIAGE part, it finally hit her and she split. Whose to say that Candlelight wasn't on to something, maybe he was leading a double life and she caught onto it and was too embarrassed to admit it to her family. I'm sure there's a lot more going on behind the scenes than anyone here knows about. It just goes to show you, don't be so quick to rush judgement on someone (like some insisted on doing with JM in this case). ;)

But....how could she hurt her family??????????
 
Sprocket said:
Sorrie. All those things may be true, however, it does NOT justify her behavior, in any way, shape or form.

This woman has issues. If she suspected her fiance of something, and she didn't have ONE PERSON she felt she could confide in, that THIS was the ONLY thing she could "do" then, that's a BIG problem there.

Sounds more like narcissistic behavior, to me.
Sooooo true! She took away from all of those out there that REALLY need help. This is not excusable. The girl is a FREAK! If I were him I'd ditch her quick......
 
I won't be surprised if it turns out that she is bipolar. She could have been in a manic mode and this can cause impulsive acts and inflated self-esteem or grandiosity.

I've noticed in all of the pictures of her on TV, her eyes look so wide open, almost as though she's in a constant state of surprise.
 
LaurenD said:
But....how could she hurt her family??????????

How about if she's unaware of others' feelings but her own?

You know, like people who hurt other people?
 
mmohucap said:
My first thought. Audrey Seiler (sp?), does anyone know if she was ever billed for all the search efforts? I heard some talk about it.

- $9,000 restitution
- Three years' probation
- mental health counseling
- 250 hours of community service

News reports stated that she volunteers for the Jacob Wetterling Foundation...
 
I am shocked by this news. A 32 year old woman having second thoughts about a wedding, even a huge wedding, as this one was, is still not reason enough to fake your own abduction.

This woman obviously has issues, and while I understand being overwhelmed by
a 600 guest wedding (she must be popular!), but to hurt your family and close friends...having them think you could be dead...well that is just wrong on so many levels.

I'd love to know what this woman was thinking. Actually, we know she WASN'T
thinking of all the police, FBI etc manpower that was wasted searching for her.

Sheesh.
 
Yeah said:
Before people start bashing this girl, think about it..........

She had a HUGE wedding that she had been focusing on for a long time. She forgot about the MARRIAGE part, it finally hit her and she split. Whose to say that Candlelight wasn't on to something, maybe he was leading a double life and she caught onto it and was too embarrassed to admit it to her family. I'm sure there's a lot more going on behind the scenes than anyone here knows about. It just goes to show you, don't be so quick to rush judgement on someone (like some insisted on doing with JM in this case). ;)

OK - I've thought about it. I still think this is awful. :doh:

Here is a great transcript from CNN today. Look at this:

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0504/30/cst.01.html

WHITFIELD: . . . Let's talk a little bit more about the family members and friends who have gathered, some 600 guest. You said John Mason, himself, is not necessarily willing to talk at this point. But what about other friends or family members, outside of the representative and the reverend we saw earlier?

MOLINEAUX: Very few of them have and it was a dramatic blast of silence when the news abruptly changed. You saw the joyous scene outside the Mason home. Once the news came out that Jennifer was, in fact, OK and there were -- it was a party. It was a party on the lawn, there were cars parked everywhere, people hugging and applauding and then all of a sudden we got the news from Albuquerque that, in fact, well, perhaps Jennifer may have made up the part about being kidnapped and -- dead silence fell over the entire compound and only a few people talked. One person I did talk to, Melinda Larson who's actually is going through marriage preparations with Jennifer because she herself is going to have her own wedding in a few weeks. She said she had no idea. It was just stunning that this happened. She was asking for a lot of love for Jennifer and a lot of support because that does, indeed, seem to be what she needs at this point. There are requests for understanding and promises of love. There's, doubtless, some anger, resentment, and utter befuddlement over what happened, so some tough days ahead. The good news and bad news tied in. We're looking at a story that was just unequivocally joyous and relieved occasion, this morning, a little more equivocal this afternoon -- Fredricka.

WHITFIELD: Yeah, lots of mixed emotions. Thanks so much, Charles Molineaux in Duluth, Georgia.

And this:

All right, Dr. Kuriansky, thanks so much for joining us.

DR. JUDY KURIANSKY, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TEACHER'S COLLEGE: Oh, you're welcome, Fredricka. Indeed being over the years, of counseling couples, there's no question that before a wedding, anyone, no matter who they are, how rich they are, whether there's 600 guests or 10 guests, there's still a lot of anxiety. But to have pulled off such an event as she did, there's deeper issues, then in a sense, it's a cry for help. There's something...

WHITFIELD: Yeah, we're not talking about just butterflies, we're talking about going 1,400 miles away, just days leading up to the wedding. We heard the pastor earlier this morning and a family member, spokesperson who said "clearly, Jennifer had issues that we didn't even know about."

KURIANSKY: Yes, and those issues should have really have been noticed a bit before, because such a dramatic act to add to this would have small clues along the way. This, in a sense, is a cry for help, really. And a very -- there are clues even to what she did. To go to Las Vegas, was that not where she first went?

WHITFIELD: Yeah, and that's some strange irony, given that a lot of people go to Las Vegas to get married.

KURIANSKY: Exactly. So the psychology of this is very deep, the psycho dynamics. They go there to get married or they go there on their honeymoon. Think about also what that means, it's a quickie sort of marriage. It's also one of the -- it's a very gambling place and it's a place where people are, you know, playing fast lives. So, this has some deep psycho dynamics for her in terms of her confusion and her conflicts over getting married, and being even a drama queen, because that is a dramatic kind of statement. She didn't go quietly off to Mexico, she went to New Mexico. There's a reason to go from Las Vegas to Albuquerque, even. All this will come out. But the point is that...

WHITFIELD: A reason beyond, perhaps, just running out of money or...

KURIANSKY: Well, it's like a -- there's something inside her that I would suspect has some kind of an addictive-type of personality that is in a psycho-analytic, psycho-dynamic way. Just even from seeing some brief pictures of her, she's very thin, isn't she?

WHITFIELD: Yes, she appears to be very thin in the photographs. You know, earlier we heard from...

KURIANSKY: Well, you put that together -- when put that together with potentially, I'm just speculating here because I don't know...

WHITFIELD: WE'LL that's a tough one because we are jumping to conclusions because we haven't had a chance to speak with her...

KURIANSKY: Oh, yes, but...

WHITFIELD: Nor anyone else who is willing to speak publicly about what's going on through her mind.

KURIANSKY: Exactly. But if you make a profile, like the FBI -- you just spoke to an FBI agent, psychologists, you know, make profiles of people and try to figure out what's going on. The fears and everything could come from some kind of eating disorder and then that puts together with going to Las Vegas as a -- you know, as a gambling addiction, fears of -- and not to say that she had those things, but those are personality traits of people who do unpredictable things who are very frightened of others really seeing their deep self. Clearly, she couldn't communicate with anyone because people did not know what was going on inside of her. Thank goodness she didn't do something rash that would endanger her life.

WHITFIELD: Now apparently, according to the pastor, the couple did get some premarital counseling. You think there should have been some inkling of a problem that she had with the wedding or the anxiety or stress she was feeling leading up to it and that perhaps it may have been overlooked?

KURIANSKY: Well, there's no question a lot of her behavior was overlooked. Because I would say, seriously, Fredricka, that this kind of reaction...

WHITFIELD: Couldn't she just be really good at masking her feeling, perhaps?

KURIANSKY: Yes, excellent, you're a good psychologist there, because there would have been some clues though, because when you behave in this way it shows that there's a pattern for not being able to face extreme stress. Basically, you run away from stress and you can't cope with it. So in her childhood or along the way -- she's now, you know, she's a woman, not a little girl -- there were some clues to how she would handle stress. So this was a big one. And what she showed is she couldn't handle stress. So everybody did -- wasn't noticing that, which may be, in fact, the way the rest of the people around her cope with it. But, you know, that premarital counseling, there is a system where some couples are required to go to some premarital counseling, from -- in a religious mode and it's very superficial, it's certainly a wonderful thing to do, but unless you're going to be real open, you don't get to the deep issues. You talk about things that are simple; you don't get to the deep fears that would lead to this, because this husband and wife were seen together. It's more a happy kind of "let's make everything work out well" as opposed to "let's dig deep into what these worse than butterflies would be."

WHITFIELD: And clearly, in this case perhaps, or in the case of Jennifer, that perhaps she wasn't thinking about the consequences of when you finally do have to fess up and tell the truth, how much more embarrassing and humiliating this is all turning out to be.

KURIANSKY: Well absolutely, and we've seen in the bridegroom-to- be's behavior. It would be -- he comes from a well-to-do family, from what we know, they have visibility and some prominence. It would be extremely embarrassing and humiliating for him and everybody in the family. I think the lesson here, for everyone, certainly might not be as dramatic as this particular young woman would be, is to really think before the wedding what every single nervous anxiety would be and to share that, to pick someone, a very good friend or a therapist even on your own, not with the husband-to-be, because that becomes something that you can't really be totally honest about. You would frighten him and he might pull out. So those two things would be really essential to be really deep, digging into your fears and feelings about it and to share them with somebody, if it's not your family member, because that's too anxiety-provoking, then someone else.

WHITFIELD: It's both a sad and a happy ending. Glad that she is safe and sound. So sad, I think everyone agrees, that it came to this. Dr. Judy Kuriansky of the Colombia University Teacher's College, thanks so much for joining us on the phone, there.
 
I understand how everyone is feeling about her right now, I really do........but we still don't know the whole story. It's very possible she didn't know of the large scale investigation and search going on. I think she DOES need a thorough mental evaluation and some heavier marriage counseling than what she got.

But, in the BIG picture........aren't you glad this had a happy ending and this wasn't another Peterson? I know I am.

OK, I'll hop off my soapbox.
 
Last time I rode a bus cross country, the bus kept a going, people slept on the bus, no newspapers, BUT BUT it did stop for folks to go potty and to eat.

NOW buses have potties in em, and TV sets every few seats, at least the bus that takes us to the mountains in Colorado to gamble do. Pretty fancy buses we have here.

SOOOOOOO, when did she eat, did she eat? From Vegas being seen in the casino, did she stay all night there? ER just a quick stop into the casino, then out again to the bus depot? I have not gone to Vegas on a bus, anyone?

I think she had more money with her than is reportedly known. I missed TV coverage today, was she still wearing her sweats and sneakers, or how was she dressed, anyone know?




.
 
Camper said:
I missed TV coverage today, was she still wearing her sweats and sneakers, or how was she dressed, anyone know?
Not real sure, but in her 911 call she said she was wearing gray running pants and the sweatshirt she'd had on since Tuesday.
 
I'm glad that she is alright and that her family has been relieved of the terrible stress they were living under for 3 days and nights.

It is said that Jennifer and her mother and Jennifer and her dad were very close. When you have a close relationship with your parents you know how they will react to different situations. She had to know that her being missing would just tear her parents up. Her decision to take off was very self centered. To drag it out over 3 days is just over the top.

I wondered about her story when she said that the couple grabbed her, cut her hair, and then shoved her into a van. What kidnappers would take the time to cut a person's hair outside the van after they had grabbed her?
It just didn't make sense to me.

I wonder whose idea it was to have a huge wedding? I don't know her or her parents but her parents seem like real down to earth people and I doubt if they had been fulfilling their dream of a huge wedding through Jennifer. Last night the media was making a big deal out of Jennifer's mom saying they were going to invite the whole town to the wedding...this was after Jennifer had called. Well heck, her mom was so happy and she was just talking. Some were really negative about her remarks..."now they want to make the wedding even bigger...she ran away because there were 600 guests coming."
Those people should be :slap: .

I'll eat my share of crow for thinking that John was involved. Jumping to conclusions...hope I learned a lesson :blushing:

We don't have the right to do whatever we want in this life. If our actions only affect us that is different but most of what we do affects others. We all watch enough TV to know what happens when someone goes missing. We know how our family would feel if they thought something had happened to us.

As a parent of 4 grown kids I can't say for sure how I would feel in the shoes of Jennifer's parents. I think I would feel relief, anger, and maybe a whole lot of disappointment.
 
May3hem said:
Agreed, to a point.

She, and any adult, for that matter, has the right to walk away without informing anyone of our intention to do so. This is the double-edged sword of living in a free society. She didn't call herself in as a missing person, she didn't organize the searches, and she certainly didn't orchestrate the media coverage. Right up until she called 911 in Albuquerque and made up that story about being kidnapped, everything she did was technically within the law (I am unaware of any law in any district that requires one to watch the news).

As for what her behavior did to her family and friends, that is a matter for her, her family and friends.
What a bunch of Malarkey!!!:doh:
 
Oh Pleez..........a Blankie over her head walking through the airport, and given a Teddy Bear for comfort during the interegation :rolleyes:

In her 911 call she says the so called woman with the abductor was about her height, 5'9". Didn't her description say she was 5'8"?

I'm wondering what's going to be the reaction of her hubby-to-be when she lands in Georgia?

Now, if that guy still marries her, then he is also "whacked".:banghead:
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
167
Guests online
3,771
Total visitors
3,938

Forum statistics

Threads
592,513
Messages
17,970,158
Members
228,790
Latest member
MelonyAnn
Back
Top