eileenhawkeye,
In the context of JAR's obsession. Can I mention his stuff being dumped into the basement and the collection of photographs discovered in the basement whose subject was JonBenet.
Could there be a link? I reckon there might be.
.
The only thing keeping me from thinking JAR was involved, is the roll of film taken from the Rs camera, by LE. In the photo interview, both JR and PR were shown pictures that LE had developed from the film taken from JR camera. Film from Christmas day.
(source)
(Notations in italics by Don Gentile and David Wright from 'The files of the National Enquirer:
"Patsy was shown photos taken off a roll of film that John Ramsey turned over to the police in the hours before JonBenet's body was found. The roll was in the camera he used to take pictures that Christmas. To get the film to the end of the roll, John snapped off the lasts few shots. In doing so he inadvertently photographed the wet bar near the foot of the spiral staircase. The photo showed a black and red scarf left on the sink counter there. Patsy couldn't say whether it was John's scarf or one she had given out as gifts to the men who attended the Ramsey Christams party on the 23rd.")
Patsy Ramsey: "...This (scarf) just looks strange to me...."
Tom Haney: "Well, this photo... was on your roll of film in your camera. And on the same roll is the next photo, a Christmas morning photo of the kids.
Patsy Ramsey: "...Oh God."
(Notations in italics by Don Gentile and David Wright from 'The files of the National Enquirer: "It was the first time Patsy had seen the photo. She broke down in tears down at this point. After she regained her composure, the questioning continued.
The photo John Ramsey had taken of the wet bar area, also showed a table near it. On it were two white lined legal pads. One of them had been used to write the ransom note. It was the same pad that contained Patsy's doodles, other writings and the so-called practice ransom note."
Tom Haney: "Like I say, this was on your roll of film and it's not exactly the same photograph that was taken by the police."
http://www.acandyrose.com/crimescene-ransomnote.htm
If JAR had been there, I would think his picture would have been taken. Unless he came later? But when? Maybe later that night, but why not earlier, it was Christmas day, where else would he have been all day, if not with his family?
I really dont think, JAR, was responsible for hurting her. I do however think, it was designed to make one think he might have, you know shadow of doubt.
The theories that have JAR on the missing video(?) forget about the still photos, wouldnt he have been in those too?
