Close your eyes and picture Suwat. Can you imagine it now?Buzzm1 said:I can't imagine a DNA test not being taken.
Close your eyes and picture Suwat. Can you imagine it now?Buzzm1 said:I can't imagine a DNA test not being taken.
Swab RumorsJBean said:The 2 attorneys that were with him today were on LKL. They said that "they had it on good authority" that the swab test never happened, despite what the media is saying.
Total Corruption At It's FinestJBean said:Close your eyes and picture Suwat. Can you imagine it now?
You have a way of making it sound like a good thing lol.Buzzm1 said:Total Corruption At It's Finest
Details said:The DNA is the key evidence, if it matches - I could figure they're taking their time to get him in custody, get a nice legal warrent to get the DNA, etc.
Exactly what I'm saying above, Details. They want a nice, clear chain of custody and all the ducks in a row, I'm guessing, so there are NO questions afterward about legalities and such.Details said:The DNA is the key evidence, if it matches - I could figure they're taking their time to get him in custody, get a nice legal warrent to get the DNA, etc.
Exactly, and they may have his DNA, and have a match for it, but need to get a nice legal swab with a warrant behind it for courtroom purposes, as Details pointed out.tybee204 said:I wondered about it before because they would need a warrent for a sample.
Hyatt said:Thanks for that info. I sure would like to know what LE DOES have on him. Did anyone tape the DA's press conference? At one point, Lacy turned to someone and said, in response to a question: "Can I answer that?" Does anyone remember what the question was? She was told not to answer it and didn't.
Yep - here's a competent lawyer finally, and he's ready to have all kinds fo fun if they take any shortcut on the DNA specimen.Details said:The DNA is the key evidence, if it matches - I could figure they're taking their time to get him in custody, get a nice legal warrent to get the DNA, etc.
OMG! I just heard the same thing, and was wondering the same thing. Why suppress it if it doesn't match?englishleigh said:Just heard them say on Fox that Karr's lawyer is motioning to suppress the mouth swab DNA test that was done in Thailand.....why???? Maybe it MATCHES??
stonewall said:Just heard on Fox that JMK's public defender has filed a motion to "suppress the DNA swab" taken in Thailand. Why would his lawyer file to suppress any previously taken DNA samples if none were taken? I think he's talked enough to his client to know. Those two female attorneys were clueless to what was going on. Finally, if the DNA taken in Thailand was NOT a match then why move to suppress it?
magpie said:I heard some speculation about chain of evidence, that maybe the defense would say they couldn't trust Thailand to test it correctly, also it might not stay in Colorado LE hands all the way back home to Boulder.. IF they took a swab.
I tend to think there is no way they don't have Karr's DNA sample yet. Even if Thailand didn't do a test, Dr Henry Lee said on TV the other day that the big supper Karr had on the plane ride home would have been a perfect time to nab a sample off of his dinner tray. Even if you couldn't use it in court, you would know if you had your man, then take an official sample when you get him in Boulder.