Wudge
New Member
Hmm, well maybe we have different conceptions of exoneration. To me evidence either exonerates someone, or it doesn't. IMO, this doesn't.
It's not compelling evidence of an intruder, it merely means there is dna in 3 palces on two articles of clothing. We don't know how it got there. We don't know that JBR didn't transfer it there herself.
The DNA found on JonBenet came in two forms. A liquid based DNA was found on her underwear. Touch based DNA was found in two different places on her leggings.
This triple-sourced DNA matched. DNA is exonerating evidence. It proves beyond a reasonable doubt that non-donars should be excluded. Therefore, the Ramseys are both excluded and exonerated.
HTH