april4sky
It is not who is right, but what is right, that is
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2005
- Messages
- 1,227
- Reaction score
- 9
From what I have read yes.I "criticize everything the McCanns say or do..."
I don't think so. I just see them through a very logical and what I think is a more objective filter. And I know I've expressed on more than one occasion the fact that I think they have suffered the loss of their child; that if indeed Madeleine suffered an accidental death resulting from being alone in the apartment, that they made the decision to fake an abduction based on fear of losing the twins. I've said that I do think they are grieving.
It's not possible to be "objective" if starting from the premise the McCanns were involved in their childs disappearance. IMO
Again it's not objective to start from the premise the McCanns are guilty of involvement and then filtering in/out whatever you choose to the detriment of them. Where is the logic in that?It's a very logical explanation that to me explains much of the contradictions, the physical evidence, and the actions and words of the McCanns themselves.
Well this might feel "objective" but it's easy as it has nothing to do with accusations and nothing to do with anything they said or did.I've even said that I don't think Gerry was an uninvolved father; given his working class background I think he is probably a much better father than his own dad was. And I think that both of them worked hard for their careers and family.
No but starting with the pretext Madeleine wasn't abducted means it's not possible to be "objective" if as you believe the McCanns are involved.What I don't do is immediately view everything they say or do with the starting pretext that their child was abducted.
This belief colours every thought about them and must affect the way you look at everything they say and do.
They know, and we know they showed poor judgement but the filter being used proves my point I think.They showed poor judgment on leaving their child alone. They haven't shown evidence of changed or improved judgment. That's just factual and for me, it's not personal.
Actually, I think my theory is much kinder to the McCanns. If they truly believe their child is in heaven due to an unfortunate accident, it is much more understandable that they say they hope she's being treated like a princess, than to think that they are in reality so abysmally naive and cruel as to think their child would be in the hands of an abductor for pedophiliac purposes, and being treated "like a princess."
Pulling apart every word they have used is IMO just another excuse to critisize them. That danged slanted filter has a lot to do with it IMO
Not as much "objective" as it is spin.
I'm not perfect either Texana, none of us are! No doubt you'll let me know.