justamommy
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2011
- Messages
- 405
- Reaction score
- 0
Just found this -
Responding officers told of theft complaint involving baby Lisa's father
"The Police Department rejected KCTV5's request to obtain a transcript or copy of the 911 call that Irwin made. The department's legal counsel said the Missouri Sunshine Law allows 911 calls to be exempted from public disclosure.
However, the dispatch calls are public. The initial dispatcher tells officers to go to "reported residential burglary in progress 3620 North Lister."
The dispatcher then matter-of-factly tells the officers to contact Irwin.
"He noticed his screen was busted and his 10-month-old daughter is missing. He advised that he didn't witness anything and didn't know how long she's been going," the dispatcher says.
Another officer asks for more details. The dispatcher repeats the information.
"The address is 3620 North Lister and the call notes are that he noticed that his 10-month-old daughter is missing and he's not sure how long she's been gone. And the screen is busted and he didn't witness anything," the dispatcher says."
http://www.kctv5.com/story/15699795/first-responding-officers-told-of-theft-complaint-involving-babys-father
Maybe they called it "in progress" because they didn't know when it had happened. Maybe this was so the LE would use caution when approaching, maybe different procedures. Just a thought.