Clearly Confused
Oh my head!
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2005
- Messages
- 1,272
- Reaction score
- 0
Testimony IS RELEVANT! Objections are overruled!
Was her testimony done without the jurors present? I started watching part of the way through?
Testimony IS RELEVANT! Objections are overruled!
Yeah, Chiquita - they ended up getting married, actually. They were married for about 3 months, IIRC.
Let me rephrase. I do not believe she married him to get more information about Janet's murder. I mean, who does that ffs? She married him because she was in love with him back then. And that's fine --- she didn't know what a he was just yet. Glad she found out on time
<3 <3 <3 Vanessa <3 <3 <3
I had totally forgotten about the spouse testifying against a former spouse thing. It is the same in all states? Anyone know off the top of your head the exact rule before I go look it up?
I'm assuming that's why she could offer nothing during the time of their marriage?
at what point did he admit to her he had done it?