After rereading many of the theories in the theories threads, it seems although most of the posters who theorize Caylee died accidently, most still maintain that KC is to blame. If Caylee somehow died accidently, I don’t know how this could be considered a premeditated murder. If any of the posters here at WS that has theorized an accidental death is somehow correct, then that would be big trouble for the prosecution.
Eleven pages of posts in the coincidence thread, that’s an awful lot of coincidences, some of these could be troublesome to the prosecutions case.
In the, evidence we have yet to see, thread, there are many, many things we have yet to see in discovery. At this time, it would seem there will be a lot of evidence that we never will see, simply because the prosecution is not going to use it at trial. It will be mathematically impossible to go through ALL the discovery we know of, and ALL the evidence we don’t know about in the estimated 6 weeks of actual trial. So, there will be a very large number of things we have discussed here, sometimes at great length, that will not even be admitted as evidence during the actual trial. To tell a basic story, you need to answer the 5 W’s, Who, What, Where, When and Why. The who, is KC, the what is Caylee died by homicide. The where and the when are unknown, and the why is questionable. Seems like we have only heard half of the prosecutions story, and unless the evidence we have yet to see tells the other half of the story, I think this is really the biggest potential problem of all for the prosecution, come trial time. As always, my entire post is my opinion only.
First Post!
