Ronald is really looking drawn. Noticed it at the pressr and his mother mentioned it to NG.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29284055/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29284055/
My heart went out to Ron last night when I listened to his Mother talk on NG. She actually had me in tears, listening to her describe his love for his daughter.
I don't know Ron, but I know a lot of men that he reminds me of in my own family. I can't entertain the thought that he knows where Haleigh is and isn't going to get her. Even if he knew she was deceased he would go get her IMHO. I see him as a simple man, not simple in intelligence but simple as in he is what he is, and what you see is what you get no hidden agendas.
Ron is the one that told bio-mom about the pink shirt being found (according to bio-mom on NG interview last night). I think that Ron isn't alienating MC for two reasons possibly: 1. He doesn't know for sure that she had anything to do with it. I'm wondering if his family (Momma) didn't talk to him and tell him not to focus on her but to focus on searching.
2. He is street smart. Very much so in my opinion. He's going to keep her close even so she will eventually tell him what she knows. Another poster said this and I had thought it too, you keep your friends close but your enemies closer. He probably doesn't know at this moment if she is friend or foe, but he's going to keep her close and watch her close for anything that might lead him to Haleigh. Including watching her give interviews, he might just be waiting for her to slip up enough.
That's just my own opinion as of right now, it could change of course.
Ron's and Misti's ages are not on trial at this point. If this turns out to be an issue related to Haleigh's disappearance then we can always open it up for more liberal discussion. but for now calling Ron names and making disparaging remarks about their age difference just isn't going to be tolerated, nor does it advance the discussion.
Name calling in general, calling people druggies, molestors just does not work for us here at WS.
Out of all the players in this tragedy, Ronnie has captured my heart. He is so typical of young men his age, in his anger and outrage over his "baby girl" being missing. How many young fathers have stepped up to the plate and taken custody of not one but two of their children. Not nearly as many as have skipped out, don't pay child support and have very little if any involvement in their child's life. I know Ronnie may not be the clean cut all American boy, but he is in my opinion he's "a diamond in the rough" far from perfect but with great possibility. God help this young man if they find his baby is no longer with us.
Out of all the players in this tragedy, Ronnie has captured my heart. He is so typical of young men his age, in his anger and outrage over his "baby girl" being missing. How many young fathers have stepped up to the plate and taken custody of not one but two of their children. Not nearly as many as have skipped out, don't pay child support and have very little if any involvement in their child's life. I know Ronnie may not be the clean cut all American boy, but he is in my opinion he's "a diamond in the rough" far from perfect but with great possibility. God help this young man if they find his baby is no longer with us.
I just wanted to post my thoughts on Ron this morning. My heart goes out to him and his family, and prayers for his precious daughters return. He has truly shown America his compassion to get his daughter back. He has cried, been angry, cursed, sad, numb, and dedicated every day to finding her, even begging searchers to not stop searching. That is the PROPER way to show grief over having a child disappear! Unlike someone else we all know.
An interesting article about body language
http://www.eyesforlies.blogspot.com/2009/02/ronald-cummings-misty-croslin-and.html
I have made my feelings known about Ron in other threads, but will weigh in. My initial gut instinct on Ron the day the case broke, was that he was guilty. I was on the phone with my sister, playfully scolding her for calling during the first five minutes of Nancy Grace. I was viewing the clip of Ron crying and I told my sister, "Uh, oh, the dad is guilty."
I then allowed myself to be swayed a little by posts claiming how sincere he was, but I knew deep down something was off. I never completely believed his innocense, but knew Misty was lying from the start.
By day 3 or 4 of the case, after reading a few clever posts here, the wheels started turning. The first was a post saying Ron said way too many times "I was at work, I was at work, I was at work." Then there was Lancelotlink's post, and a couple other ones, (I will see if I can find them), and a huge lightbulb went on in my head, knocking Misty out of the main suspect position and moving Ron in, with Misty as something of an accomplice, but not sure as to what extent.
I do not believe Ron's account of the night Haleigh went missing. I believe Ron either left for work later than he says, came home during the shift, or came home from work early. I think he is not crying for his daughter, but is trying to perform. I think he is trying too hard to behave like an innocent person. When he looks at the camera (because he may have read guilty people look down a lot, like he and Misty did in the beginning), he seems to be making too great an effort, (the video where he is walking with his arm around Misty and the Greta interview are examples of this), almost as if he is challenging the camera, staring it down.
And, like the body language expert said, "He is fascinating to watch." To me, he is also terrifying to watch.
I think LE is keeping things close to the vest for many reasons.
Except for the fact that LE has checked him out and confirmed that he WAS at work, and they are satisfied that he was working the whole time. If this were not the case, they would not have made that statement several times, that his alibi is solid... he was working and not at home at the time of the disappearance.
Except for the fact that LE has checked him out and confirmed that he WAS at work, and they are satisfied that he was working the whole time. If this were not the case, they would not have made that statement several times, that his alibi is solid... he was working and not at home at the time of the disappearance.
The first was a post saying Ron said way too many times "I was at work, I was at work, I was at work."
I do not believe Ron's account of the night Haleigh went missing. I believe Ron either left for work later than he says, came home during the shift, or came home from work early. I think he is not crying for his daughter, but is trying to perform. I think he is trying too hard to behave like an innocent person. When he looks at the camera (because he may have read guilty people look down a lot, like he and Misty did in the beginning), he seems to be making too great an effort, (the video where he is walking with his arm around Misty and the Greta interview are examples of this), almost as if he is challenging the camera, staring it down.
And, like the body language expert said, "He is fascinating to watch." To me, he is also terrifying to watch.
I think LE is keeping things close to the vest for many reasons.
An interesting article about body language
http://www.eyesforlies.blogspot.com/2009/02/ronald-cummings-misty-croslin-and.html
Snipped your quote just a little! Your take on this is very interesting, very different from mine.
Don't you think it's possible that Ron was saying "I was at work." over and over because the dispatcher was asking him questions he could not possibly know the answers to? Such as "what was she wearing?" .
Also, if Ron's arrival time and departure time from work were in dispute, LE would be all over him. That was surely among the first five things they checked out!!
I, too, think his body language is fascinating. He looks to me like a young man trying very, very hard to hold it together, to look macho when that is the opposite of how he feels.
Since we don't know the exact time that Haleigh disappeared, it is possible that something happened before he went to work and he went to work to create an alibi when the story came out. He kept emphasizing that he was at work, and maybe he was. But, then, maybe he wasn't when it happened, only later.
Except for the fact that LE has checked him out and confirmed that he WAS at work, and they are satisfied that he was working the whole time. If this were not the case, they would not have made that statement several times, that his alibi is solid... he was working and not at home at the time of the disappearance.
Since we don't know the exact time that Haleigh disappeared, it is possible that something happened before he went to work and he went to work to create an alibi when the story came out. He kept emphasizing that he was at work, and maybe he was. But, then, maybe he wasn't when it happened, only later.
The only statement by LE that I know of involving Ron being at work, was at a presser, and even that left questions.