taffodills
Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2023
- Messages
- 31
- Reaction score
- 12
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Will you lend me your experience? Albeit you believe the perpetrator had been identified, I would like your input(and criticism) for the posts that I will be adding. There is this one scenario that I will provide and we'll will see how far it goes. First, I will add a post a few pictures that I need help with and then go on from there.People tend to forget Simpson was found liable for the deaths of both in a civil case, and that the criminal charges were only dismissed on a technicality.
Mountains of evidence were were unusable due to a detective storing it improperly.
When I say dozens, its probably more like hundreds of experts mulled over the evidence over they years, and I have only ever seen a handful that said there was any reason not to believe Simpson committed both murders.
IMO It was essentially solved.
Sure but there's no need... Mountains of evidence that would convict anyone else in any other city, wouldn't point solely to one killer if there were any other possibilities.Will you lend me your experience? Albeit you believe the perpetrator had been identified, I would like your input(and criticism) for the posts that I will be adding. There is this one scenario that I will provide and we'll will see how far it goes. First, I will add a post a few pictures that I need help with and then go on from there.
IMO, it’s disrespectful of the families to suggest other scenarios at this point. OJ was found not guilty by reason of the glove being too dried out (have we seen a defendant try on evidence in court since?) and his hands swollen from a planned break from medication he took.People tend to forget Simpson was found liable for the deaths of both in a civil case, and that the criminal charges were only dismissed on a technicality.
Mountains of evidence were were unusable due to a detective storing it improperly.
When I say dozens, its probably more like hundreds of experts mulled over the evidence over they years, and I have only ever seen a handful that said there was any reason not to believe Simpson committed both murders.
IMO It was essentially solved.
I don’t believe in heaven or hell but i hope you’re right where OJ’s concerned.OP I believe yours is a fruitless.line of.imquiry. OJ is currently facing the consequences of his actions, IMHO
indeed plus there was a huge amount of evidence that wasnt allowed.IMO, it’s disrespectful of the families to suggest other scenarios at this point. OJ was found not guilty by reason of the glove being too dried out (have we seen a defendant try on evidence in court since?) and his hands swollen from a planned break from medication he took.
My possible scenarios are predicated on Orenthal James Simpson being a part of the planned attack on Ms. Simpson or Mr. Simpson was not involved at all; that includes possibilities of accidentally coming across the crime in progress, after the crime was committed, or Mr. Simpson was contacted to come to the scene of the crime by a friendly perpetrator(s).@taffodills
not to rehash a subject wherein 99.9 percent of the
noddying donkeys in the U.S. have settled on O.J.
as the murderer, but I'm curious - in your numbered
possibilities listed in your post;
CA - Ronald Lyle Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson found dead June 12 1994
there doesn't seem to be a possibility that allows for
Private Investigator's William C. Dears theory on why
O.J. shielded the murderer and as to who the murderer
actually was:
Private Investigator Claims He Has Proof of OJ Simpson's Innocence - RELEVANT
Why do you not include (or reject?) a theory, pretty
much as William C. Dear suggests, as a possibility?
(Note; normally, I might ask this in a PM, but your
forum settings apparently don't allow such an action).