Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's still rebuttal.Interesting, evidence then rest. But I have unanswered questions!
Anyone a little surprised that neither CM or MM was called?
This is the third 'complaint' that I have heard from this jury so far.
1. Too much talking in the courtroom
2. Too much staring at the jury
3. Wanting the trial to move a little faster, tired of being there
Is this morning the defense evidence buffet table? Well it may just be passing of the plate.
Interesting, evidence then rest. But I have unanswered questions!
Interesting. Well, they had said they were almost done the other day.
From a tactical perspective, if the state were not quite ready with this new evidence and I only had marginal witnesses left, I might just rest to put the state on the spot of do you have the "new" evidence or not rather than give them more time to prepare.
However, I don't think that was the defense move as they had declared earlier they planned to be done around the end of the week (Trenkle had told the judge that).
Well, I definitely have never been to their support pages because I actually didn't know that there was such a thing as Google Support. Sounds like an Oxymoron.
I haven't seen it said here that it was all cookie files that were invalid. But, with 45+ pages of posts, I may have missed that.
Oh, you're not, but there will be plenty of folks from BC's team that will be along soon to demean them. Kind of like when they blasted me for not knowing what I was talking about despite the fact that I proved that the cursor files were .bmp files, because, you know, the "expert" said that they wouldn't be.
I'm not trusting the "experts" from either side. I'm doing my own research. Unlike them, I have no vested interest in the results.
I can honestly say that assuming nothing groundbreaking happens in rebuttal (and that's a big if), I wouldn't be surprised with any of the possible 3 choices for a verdict (G, NG, hung) at this point in time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by macd View Post
Was the crazy future date 2038?
The Unix time counts the number of seconds since 1/1/1970. On a 32-bit system:
Minimum Unix Time (0) = 1/1/1970
Maximum Unix Time (0xFFFFFFFF) = 1/19/2038
OK wait you are suddenly making very good sense to me. If the search was originally done on a linux machine the timestamps would be in unix time. If those files were then dropped on to a Windows Vista machine there would be an operating system mismatch. This could cause those timestamps to show as invalid. Right?
Brought this over from yesterday's thread since the thread was locked.
IMO, G is out as a possibility. The jury has no idea what other witnesses the defense has not called and what their effect on the pros case would be; therefore, I believe they think they have heard enough to justify reasonable doubt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by macd View Post
Was the crazy future date 2038?
The Unix time counts the number of seconds since 1/1/1970. On a 32-bit system:
Minimum Unix Time (0) = 1/1/1970
Maximum Unix Time (0xFFFFFFFF) = 1/19/2038
OK wait you are suddenly making very good sense to me. If the search was originally done on a linux machine the timestamps would be in unix time. If those files were then dropped on to a Windows Vista machine there would be an operating system mismatch. This could cause those timestamps to show as invalid. Right?
Brought this over from yesterday's thread since the thread was locked.
Or they have heard enough to justify guilty
Or they have heard so much and understand very little of it which will justify people going in different directions and justify hung