Palomine
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2011
- Messages
- 1,291
- Reaction score
- 3
You think?
I'm thinking they'll take at least 1 day if they actually go through the evidence.
this will be over today
You think?
I'm thinking they'll take at least 1 day if they actually go through the evidence.
His witness, GM who has done forensic analysis on over 400 computers believes the invalid deleted cookie and watermark and invalid time stamps are indicative of a dropped file.
You think?
I'm thinking they'll take at least 1 day if they actually go through the evidence.
this will be over today
If the Jury gets the case today there will be a verdict before 5
I definately think the jury will get the case today. I predict a verdict by 5pm tomorrow.:twocents:
I thought Kurtz did a great job! I loved the Thomas Jefferson reference.
Well, I am still not impressed. Wasn't that great an argument, IMO.
oops, pardon my bad manners............hello everyone:seeya:
have been reading like a mad woman and watching the wral videos.........
caught up now and i must say...............if this jury follows the law and not their emotions, brad will walk...........
GM was not a witness at trial, so people should really stop calling him a witness IMO.
The defense violated the trial rules (not listing him as a potential witness), therefore he was not allowed to testify, so please don't whine to me about it either, thanks!
Welcome. I have that same fear but honestly I think we've all seen much better closing arguments by the defense. Kurtz covered all points he needed and even snuck in few. I truly don't know what Trenkle has left to talk about. I thought maybe it was him that texted Kurtz and said "just never mind me."