BlueCrab
New Member
sissi said:I believe what isn't in her stomach is an important clue in the telling of where the crime occurred,I do not believe she was murdered in the Ramsey home, and believe she threw up her stomach contents during her abduction.
While we discuss pineapple and the ransom note as important clues, and they are, we ignore the animal fur in her hands. There is more to this fur than we have heard, IMO it is one of the most important clues they have. Find the animal, the type of animal and find the killer.
If it belongs to her own dog, which wasn't present in the house that night, then we can consider her going outside and either running into her dog or being in the Barnhill's garage. We don't know the source of this fur, so we can conjure up anything.
IMO the artifact on her tongue was a little residual material from vomiting , since clearly there is no matching area in the house to indicate her either vomiting or urinating on any surface there leaves open a good chance she wasn't murdered in her home.
Sissi,
I'm forced to respond to the three items you brought up in your post:
o There is NO evidence that JonBenet vomited. Her stomach was empty because the pineapple she ate about one-hour prior to dying had been passed on by the stomach to the next stage of digestion -- in the small intestine.
o Forensics has no problem identifying and matching animal hair to the animal. It's no mystery.
o An artifact is usually considered a man-made object of some kind. So the "artifact" on the tip of JonBenet's tongue was an artificial object of some kind and not something natural (such as food) she had eaten and then vomited.
JMO