I really don't get it and IMO the jury is quite likely to feel similar in that so what?? So what if Dersitine could actually prove that this one witness of his is ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.. So what?? If even Dersitine were to pull out a golden copy of the school's inside surveillance video that was able to show a close up of TLM's face as she entered the inner sanctum of this elementary school as well as showed her and Tori meeting up on camera in those halls of that elementary school.. AND ALL CAUGHT ON VIDEO AND IN TURN SHOWN TO THE MEMBERS OF THE JURY!!! ... Again I ask.. SO WHAT????
To be completely honest about the situation with TLM and her having chosen Tori as the victim on that fateful day of April 8, 2009.. It has been my opinion that it is much much much more likely that TLM did indeed know of, know who Tori was, knew that Tori was TM's daughter, and may or may not have chosen Tori for a personal vendetta or hatred toward Tara.. Much more likely than any personal vendetta I believe that TLM took Tori for the simple fact that she knew who Tori "belonged to".. IOW it was nothing to do with Tara whatsoever, and nothing to do with Tori whatsoever.. It simply had to do with the fact that Tori was someone/anyone at that school with whom she was familiar with enough that should she encounter Tara or James by chance as she was leaving the school with Tori.. TLM could easily be on the look out for and be able to quickly abort the plan upon her seeing those to whom Tori "belonged to"..
You see it's the one point that actually can be made sense of IMO as to why it was Tori that was chosen on that day.. And IMO It hadn't a damn thing to do with any vendetta(drug, money, jealousy, revenge, etc, etc).. NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH ANY PERSONAL ISSUE WHATSOEVER BETWEEN TLM AND ANYONE IN TORI'S FAMILY.. But rather much different and sadly much more simple and basic was the reason for TLM having chosen Tori was purely out of necessity in that as she walked with Tori through and off of the school campus she had the benefit of knowing who Tori "belonged to" she could keep her eye out for who Tori "belonged to".. And she could abort if necessary in TLM seeing someone whom Tori "belonged to".. IMO it is that very simple and basic necessity that would greatly benefit TLM.. That is the only reason that Tori was chosen..
For me what made me finally commit(in my minds eye) that TLM did chose Tori for a specific motive was the fact that in my looking at the situation and the circumstance of that very day and removed Tori from the equation and instead plugged in Little girl, Jane Doe into the equation in place of Tori.. Well the picture became IMO crystal clear that by changing that one, tiny factor in the equation that IT DRASTICALLY CHANGED AND EVEN POSSIBLY PREVENTED THE ENIRE PLAN FROM BEING SUCCESSFULLY EXECUTED.. Jmo, tho..
With Little girl, Jane Doe TLM did NOT have that most important advantage that she had with Tori.. With Jane Doe TLM hadn't a damn clue who Jane Doe "belonged to".. Which I'm going to assume that you all understand exactly what it is that I'm saying as well as understand the huge difference of possible outcomes that become available when taking Tori OUT of the equation and replacing her with any other little girl there that day..
In looking at the events that occurred that afternoon in the way above described IMOO it became very apparent to me that TLM absolutely did chose Tori Stafford as to who would be their victim.. The reasons above described became clear to me and yet in a very different manner than how this defense seems to attempt to allude to in that if they somehow can make the jury believe that Tori was specifically chosen by TLM that it somehow equals none or ATLEAST lesser culpability on the part of his client, MR.. And for me Dersitine could not be more dead wrong in that assumption!!!!!
Because in now coming full circle I will again ask, SO WHAT?!?!!
TLM and how TLM went about choosing and/or snatching who"it" would be that April 8th afternoon that she procured for her lover, MR to unleash his evil sexually dysfunctional needs onto.. And then one/both of them coldly, callously, and savagely beat to death.. How TLM went about choosing who she would deliver as the sacrificial lamb to her lover, MR is ABSOLUTELY, WITHOUT A DOUBT IRRELEVANT to this case.. More specifically it is irrelevant to MR's guilt/not guilt in this case.. This jury is instructed to decide merely was MR involved in any/all of the heinous atrocities that were committed on this small, precious child.. Both pre and post mortem..*
Dersitine can bring it on home with the video itself with TLM's face clear as a bell visible to every single person in that courtroom and show her inside the school with the victim, Tori(and obviously there is no such video).. It is absolutely of no relevancy in speaking of his clients involvement in "ANY" or in "ALL" of it..And that very simply is what this jury is there to determine..
Moo..moo..moo.. Moo.. And MORE MOO!!!!
