he had plenty of time to wipe down the scene
he touched many things in the house, the phone, the guns
it was in the winter so he probably had gloves on..and by the time he was suspected all the clothes he ditched were long gone
he was in protective custody with the rest of his family..until the 9 year old said what happened
he could not wipe down that whole house if he spent years in it, the crime scene pictures from the trial show blood spread throughout that house on surfaces such as carpet that you can't wipe down, and he didn't have gloves on at some point that night as a print of his was matched to a beer can,
he chased those children all over that house so that there blood was mixed together in many places, he had to have been sweating concidering what was done to those kids and you can't see sweat as it falls and lands on surfaces
I will forever be astounded that not one single spot of his DNA was found at that crime scene, not one skin cell, not one drop of blood, not one drop of sweat, not one of his hairs,
he was picking up pieces of wood that were splintered and broken and yet he never got snagged by the splinters so as to leave his blood, he was stabbing children as they ran yet never nicked his skin to make it bleed, he was breaking handles of big sharp knives yet never broke his skin causing it to bleed,
I think he is guilty, but it sure wasn't a slam dunk case as there was no forensic evidence, the ID of him by one of the surviving victims wasn't very sound and he kept changing his story and blaming others as well as Jessie, his so called confession isn't that sound either,
this case really stayed with me because of what was done to the children,